SBIR/STTR Research Award

gPC Methods for Validation of Future Air Traffic Management Concepts

Award identifier 5652064c1ba5e2fc4587b3a4331eb9f775a27f0a14583c36b950bc506f1c4f64Awarding agency National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Award amount

$124,977

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2020

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
BARRON ASSOCIATES, INC.
Proposal award date
2020-08-28
Contract end date
2021-03-01
UEI
C8FUKQKC9JB4
Solicitation number
SBIR_20_P1
Topic code
A3

Research abstract

The NASA Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate (ARMD) is supporting the development of a number of different concepts of airspace operations from trajectory based operations (TBO) to UAS traffic management (UTM) to urban air mobility (UAM). While these air traffic management concepts differ greatly in the details, the validation goal remains the same. To achieve safe operation, one must minimize flight risk. The current NAS relies on the cognition and decision-making capabilities of human actors to minimize flight risk. In order to realize the future air traffic management concepts described above, new validation strategies are required that can replace the safety assurances currently provided by the human actors in the system. The overall goal of the proposed research program is to develop a new validation strategy for future air traffic management concepts that is based on a probabilistic modeling methodology called generalized polynomial chaos (gPC). As measures of safety in aviation are inherently probabilistic, gPC provides a unique advantage over other methodologies that can isolate worst-case behavior but cannot necessarily quantify the likelihood of a hazardous/catastrophic event. During Phase I, Barron Associates will: (1) identify near-term, mid-term, and long-term air traffic management concepts, (2) define the operating space (e.g. variations in the airspace environment) and safety metrics for each concept, (3) compute a gPC model that maps the operating space for a given air traffic management concept to the set of metrics that characterize system safety, and (4) analyze the gPC model to quantify how the operating space impacts the safety metrics. While the Phase I program is structured to support a traditional validation process that occurs before fielding a new technology, Barron Associates will outline how the same techniques (with a few minor modifications) can be used to support In-Time System-wide Safety Assurance (ISSA).

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

331 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1987–2025). Reported award amounts total $130,507,041. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Health and Human Services, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Commerce, Department of Education, Department of Energy

Contractor profile

BARRON ASSOCIATES, INC.

Historical federal award activity, when published, is on that contractor profile. Matched by UEI only.

Agency intelligence

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.