SBIR/STTR Research Award

Hierarchical Zeolite Catalysts for Renewable Surfactant Chemicals Platform

Award identifier adbfa43f553459e6cc2bd0ded88e13524cf1fbeb989a9316b9522d40aefd0a37Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$1,149,991

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2020

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
SIRONIX RENEWABLES , INC.
Proposal award date
2020-08-24
Contract end date
2022-08-23
UEI
H2HUNRZ4U7E3
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0002156
Topic code
09d.1

Research abstract

Current catalytic routes to surfactant ingredients used in the $12 billion U.S. cleaning products industry are energy intensive and inefficient, producing molecules with limited function and high energy cost. There exists an opportunity to significantly reduce the energy intensity of laundry detergents production and transportation through the design of an atomically precise material that can be used to efficiently separate intermediates for a new platform of renewable surfactants with improved detergency properties. Conventionally, surfactants for laundry detergents are co-formulated with chelating agents, which help boost the detergency performance of a surfactant in hard water conditions, but add substantial cost, volume, and negative environmental impact. Through Phase I research, a new class of oleo-furan surfactants were identified to have 500x greater hard water stability compared with existing surfactants, meaning they can be used in detergent formulations free of chelating agent additives. This enables detergent products with up to 30% higher concentration, less cost, and lower energy requirements through a reduction in chemical production and transportation cost. Phase II research demonstrated a new, scalable production process, which consolidated reaction steps and dramatically improved production efficiency. In this Phase IIB effort, a new atomically-precise materials technology will be developed, which is the key to improving product separations for producing the Phase I and Phase II developed surfactant materials. High-throughput screening will accelerate material development, followed by integration within the production process as well as contract reaction work to provide scale-up demonstration. The new cleaning product ingredient surfactant provides a substantial performance and cost reduction competitive advantage by eliminating the need for chelating agent additives in formulations, which will enable substantial market expansion of bio-renewable laundry detergents and cleaning products by providing the function of two ingredients in the form of a single, multi- functional ingredient. Moreover, the new ingredient provides a better-performing alternative to existing ether-sulfate surfactants, which face mounting regulatory pressure due to carcinogenic byproducts, which contaminate drinking water supply.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

6 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2016–2022). Reported award amounts total $3,454,338. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase II, Phase I

Agencies: Department of Energy, National Science Foundation

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.