SBIR/STTR Research Award

A Novel Workflow to Screen for Illicit Drug Exposure in Newborns

Award identifier f2de309ce96806c49dc7ee59060a56768ff646901ab3ed6cbb46500cb12210e4Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$1,388,775

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2020

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
BAEBIES, INC.
Proposal award date
2020-08-15
Contract end date
2022-07-31
UEI
NZSZBQ9B84T1
Solicitation number
DA19-019
Topic code
NIDA

Research abstract

ABSTRACT A Novel Workflow to Screen for Illicit Drug Exposure in Newborns (RFA-DA-19-019) Neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) refers to a spectrum of withdrawal symptoms in newborns who were exposed to illicit or addictive substances in utero. Babies with NAS have higher rates of fetal anomalies (congenital malformations, growth restriction, ischemic placental complications) and perinatal issues (preterm delivery, poor feeding, sleep difficulties, diarrhea, seizures), which together raise the risk for adverse long term outcomes. Rates of NAS have skyrocketed during the last decade and estimates suggest that 5% of mothers use at least one addictive drug during their pregnancy. To address this public health crisis, multiple groups including the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology and the American Academy of Pediatrics recommend universal screening of substance use in pregnancy using standardized behavioral scoring tools. Unfortunately, such tools are often biased due to subjective scoring or self-reporting errors, and fail to identify babies who did not receive proper prenatal care. Early identification of NAS is essential for referral of affected babies for interventions, including pharmacological treatments and behavioral/social support for the family. Select hospitals in Ohio and Texas are already engaged in universal toxicology based newborn screening (NBS) for NAS, and several state public health programs are evaluating feasibility to incorporate NAS screening into their standard NBS panels. While toxicology NBS for NAS is expanding in the U.S., several factors currently restrict the growth of such programs. These include: limited sensitivity and short history of exposure with existing tests for urine and blood samples, challenging methodologies for meconium sample processing, limited testing options for meconium samples, and long turnaround times for the few existing meconium tests. The potential consequences of delayed or otherwise insufficient NAS screening include increased errors and/or delays in pharmacologic treatments, high costs associated with unnecessary hospitalization, and increased risk for misdiagnosis. To combat these challenges, we propose a novel workflow that will enable rapid toxicology screening of urine or meconium samples in the hospital. Our system will pair a simple sample preparation protocol with a high sensitivity panel of homogeneous enzyme immunoassays recognizing five common classes of drugs: fentanyl, morphine, amphetamine/methamphetamine, cocaine, and benzodiazepines. The tests will be automated on an innovative digital microfluidic analyzer with a total time to result, including sample processing time, of under 2 hours. The product of this research meets the goals of RFA-DA-19-019 to develop “innovative methods to identify and treat newborns exposed to opioids” and will furthermore support the goals of the American Academy of Pediatrics to expand high sensitivity NAS screening. The potential benefits from implementation of our protocol include reduced length of hospitalization for unaffected newborns, accelerated time to confirmatory results, faster resolution of acute withdrawal symptoms, and improved referral to family/maternal support services.PROJECT NARRATIVE Neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) refers to the numerous and diverse withdrawal symptoms in newborns who were exposed to illicit or addictive substances in utero. Early identification of NAS through neonatal screening (observational and toxicological testing in tandem) is essential to diagnosing affected babies for appropriate interventions, including pharmacological treatments and behavioral/social support for the family. Our proposed novel testing platform will enable rapid toxicology screening of urine or meconium samples in the hospital to recognize five classes of drugs commonly impacting NAS newborns: fentanyl, morphine, amphetamines, cocaine, and benzodiazepines. Improvements to the diagnosis process through our workflow include reduced length of hospitalization for unaffected newborns, utilization of sample types with increased sensitivity, accelerated time to confirmatory results, faster resolution of acute withdrawal symptoms, and improved referral to family/maternal support services.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

45 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2014–2025). Reported award amounts total $42,450,057. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase II, Phase I, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.