SBIR/STTR Research Award

Virtual Reality Joint Terminal Attack Controller Trainer

Award identifier 2441516633eec26f576c6ea20475371c9aab3a7fa6225a003c3648b0c9861718Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$2,930,182

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Award year

2020

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
HAVIK SOLUTIONS LLC
Proposal award date
2020-08-06
Contract end date
2021-11-06
UEI
K8SPC6ACJGE7
Solicitation number
X20.R
Topic code
AF20R-DCSO1

Research abstract

There is an opportunity to enhance United States Air Force (USAF) mission training functions by implementing an immersive Virtual Reality (VR) simulation environment with embedded learning management training support aids. As the USAF’s technological and operational capabilities advance, it has never been more paramount to continue educating and developing personnel using the most effective tools and processes. To facilitate the reimagined Air Force training effort, innovative concepts, techniques, and the adoption of a proven VR collaborative training environment is vital. Lt. Gen Steven Kwast, head of Air Education and Training Command (AETC) sited “cognitive repetitions” as the key to quickly learning new skillsets, and the importance of leveraging VR as a means to cheaply and efficiently take airmen through these repetitions. Maj. Scott Van De Water, deputy director of the Pilot Training Next program, during a recent interview, when asked about the why behind utilization of VR for training, stated, “The overall objective [is], how do we expedite learning, how do we increase the durability of the learning? As they’re learning these concepts, how do we arrive at the end point faster? How do we become more efficient with our resources, not for the sake of resources, but for the sake of student time — getting them out to the Air Force … quicker...”  Air Force Secretary Heather Wilson and Chief of Staff Gen. Dave Goldfein have stated their investment in determining how to use this kind of a model throughout the Air Force, beyond just pilot training. The number of Joint Terminal Attack Controllers has more than tripled from about 450 in the 1990s to more than 1,500 today, yet according to Gen. Herbert Carlisle "we're still not meeting the requirement." "The demand for training ... and producing those guys and keeping them current has gone up. That's part of the challenge." Live JTAC training is expensive, potentially dangerous, and presents many logistical hurdles, and as such is a prime candidate for a VR simulation training solution.  Unfortunately, the simulation solutions that exist today require a building, a dedicated sim operator, and complex hardware; they have low fidelity software, lack data collection capabilities, and are extremely expensive; they’re not cross platform compatible, mobile, or fully immersive.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

3 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2020–2024). Reported award amounts total $16,327,439. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase II, Phase I, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.