SBIR/STTR Research Award

Intelligent Sensor Systems - 2020

Award identifier 47881c483cfeda5fc51704139741263ee15c5e1baa35b3e49f27e06bb1f2466aAwarding agency National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Award amount

$121,625

Program and phase

STTR · Phase I

Award year

2020

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
SEV1TECH, LLC
Proposal award date
2020-08-05
Contract end date
2021-09-30
UEI
NET4AMKV5BL7
Solicitation number
STTR_20_P1
Topic code
T13

Research abstract

Testing of rocket engines requires an extensive instrumentation of the article under test in order to collect data on the performance of various aspects of the engine.nbsp; Currently these sensors require extensive wiring both on the test article and within the test stand in order to connect the sensors to the data acquisition equipment.nbsp; This instrumentation is complex, often including several hundreds of sensors that are attached or embedded at various locations on the article in order to provide situational awareness of the health and performance of the test article.nbsp; The process of connecting the sensors requires engineering of complex wiring paths, harnesses, amplifiers, signal conditioners, calibration interfaces, etc. on both the test article and the test stand in order to communicate the information to the data acquisition system.nbsp; The integration of the test article into the test stand requires extensive time for connection of each sensor to the data acquisition equipment, testing the connections and equipment, and calibrating the sensor for its environment and other processes to ensure accurate and robust data collection. This process can be a significant amount of time and manpower to accomplish, during which time the test stand remains manned and occupied.nbsp; This incurs significant costs both in the direct cost associated with an active test stand, and with lost opportunity cost because the test stand cannot be used for other testing.Our proposed innovation is to create a comprehensive end-to-end architecture to support rapid yet robust instrumentation and integration of test articles into the test stand leveraging wireless sensor technology. This innovation will reduce instrumentation costs, test stand maintenance costs, and test article integration costs while still maintaining a robust, reliable, and verifiable data acquisition capability. Existing solutions are not adequate to support the requirements for NASA instrumentation and data acquisition.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

4 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2010–2020). Reported award amounts total $437,478. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I

Agencies: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Homeland Security

Contractor profile

SEV1TECH, LLC

Historical federal award activity, when published, is on that contractor profile. Matched by UEI only.

Agency intelligence

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

NAICS intelligence

This classification comes from the contractor profile, not from the SBIR award record.

Contractor industry classification NAICS 541512

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.