SBIR/STTR Research Award

Phosphosulindac for dry eye

Award identifier b65850430a7680c9293d02394d77d71c5856805adf3b8acf058a6f069ea690d9Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$377,136

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2020

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
Apis Therapeutics, LLC
Proposal award date
2020-08-01
Contract end date
2021-07-31
UEI
HJFTTHWQ97R4
Solicitation number
PA18-574
Topic code
N

Research abstract

ABSTRACT The treatment of dry eye disease (DED) has been hampered by weak agents, significant side effects and high cost. The pathophysiological hallmark of DED that unifies its diverse etiologies is inflammation of the ocular surface that accounts for its clinical manifestations. The optimal treatment of DED must provide strong efficacy; topical analgesia; safety; convenient dosing; and low cost. None of the available treatments for DED meets these criteria.Phosphosulindac (PS) is a proprietary compound. We developed novel robust rabbit models of DED encompassing its main pathophysiological subgroups (evaporative, aqueous deficient and mixed). PS showed remarkable efficacy against DED; excellent safety; practically instantaneous topical analgesia; superiority in terms of efficacy over cyclosporine and lifitegrast, the two currently available drugs for the treatment of DED; and has projected low cost Additional preliminary data include the IND-enabling development of a scaled-up synthesis of PS; and development and validation of all the required analytical methods. We have also identified molecular targets of PS; and developed several formulations for PS encompassing the main physicochemical categories.Our goal is to develop PS as an efficacious drug for DED. In this Fast Track application, we propose the following studies:Phase I studies: Aim#1: Study the effect of PS in an evaporative model of DED, complementing our results with the aqueous deficient and mixed models. Aim #2: Develop the lead formulation of PS.Phase II studies: Aim #3: Optimize the lead formulation from aim #2. Aim #4: Study the in vitro metabolic stability and plasma protein binding of PS. Aim #5: Perform toxicity studies of PS. And Aim # 6: Prepare the IND protocol and package for the FDA.The proposed work, if successful, will contribute greatly towards a successful treatment of DED, a prevalent human disease, which represents an unmet medical need.NARRATIVE Dry eye disease affects 1 in 6 humans in the US and worldwide. The treatment of dry eye disease using pharmacological agents is suboptimal and new agents are urgently needed. We are proposing to develop a novel compound, phosphosulindac, which is potentially a highly effective and safe agent. The expected results will pave the way towards the completion of preclinical evaluation of phosphosulindac, a required step prior to its testing in humans.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

2 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2020–2022). Reported award amounts total $2,442,880. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase II, Phase I

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.