SBIR/STTR Research Award

Serologic assays for detection of Zika virus antibodies for clinical diagnosis and blood donor counseling

Award identifier e9e3315a3b398a7a70b48bc4ecc4d01df37a29e0bf2cfa782c5ac1637363b396Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$1,989,300

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2020

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
KEPHERA DIAGNOSTICS LLC
Proposal award date
2020-07-22
Contract end date
2022-06-30
UEI
LJFNSE6NM648
Solicitation number
PA19-272
Topic code
NIAID

Research abstract

PROJECT SUMMARY Zika virus, until recently an obscure mosquito-borne flavivirus from Africa, emerged rapidly in 2015-2016 to pose a major threat to public health in the Western Hemisphere. Having traveled across the Pacific, it quickly became endemic in South and Central America, Mexico and the Caribbean, carried by a compatible Aedes mosquito vector population. While Zika virus infection is typically relatively benign in the acute stage, it is has been causally linked to Congenital Zika Syndrome (CZS) exemplified by microcephaly in infants born to infected women, and to Guillain-Barré syndrome and meningitis. In addition to transmission by mosquito bite, Zika can be transmitted by sexual contact and through blood transfusions. The World Health Organization (WHO) declared Zika to be an international public health emergency, and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) promptly ramped up efforts to prepare for and respond to the threat posed by Zika in the United States. Accordingly, FDA advised the temporary deferral of blood donors who had potential exposure in endemic areas such as Puerto Rico, and approved the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of investigational blood screening assays detecting viral RNA. However, the duration of viremia is very short, such that most individuals exposed to Zika virus are likely to be negative when tested for viral RNA, and the only means to detect prior exposure and associated health risks in such cases is through serologic tests for antibodies to the virus. As the emergence of Zika as a significant human health threat is quite recent, the development of diagnostic assays is still at an early stage, with the first generation of commercial products for serologic testing falling short of ideal performance. A major challenge has been the differentiation of Zika from Dengue virus infection, given that the two viruses are genetically closely related, are carried by the same mosquito vectors, and overlap geographically in regions of endemicity. A large fraction of the endemic population carries IgG to Dengue as a result of prior exposure, and the presence of this background Dengue IgG complicates the detection of Zika antibodies in the same individuals. While the 2015-2016 Zika outbreak has subsided, the potential for a recurrence requires public health readiness, including accurate assays to detect infection. This project addresses the critical need for a highly sensitive and specific serological assay for Zika virus infection that avoids cross- reactivity with Dengue and other viral infections. This assay is needed clinically to identify pregnant women at risk of CZS due to an earlier exposure, as well as epidemiologically to monitor the extent of Zika exposure in a possible outbreak where NAAT testing is impractical due to the time limitations for detection of viremia. In Phase I, we demonstrated feasibility of a prototype assay specific for the Zika virus that accurately distinguished human IgG and IgM antibodies to Zika virus from those elicited by Dengue virus infection. In Phase II, we plan to refine this assay into a commercial product ready for scaled up manufacture, validate it in preclinical studies and prepare for commercial launch for research use and subsequent regulatory submissions for vitro diagnostic use.PROJECT NARRATIVE This project addresses the critical need for a clinical diagnostic assay for Zika virus infection. This viral infection has emerged as a threat to public health and the blood supply, yet current tests that detect Zika antibodies are not reliable and cross-react with Dengue and other related viruses. In Phase I, we developed a test specific for the Zika virus that allows accurate serologic identification of Zika infection in individuals who may also have had exposure to Dengue virus. In Phase II we will refine this assay into a manufactured product, scale up production, carry out a preclinical study to validate its performance, and reach agreement with FDA on a subsequent clinical study for approval of the product for in vitro diagnostic use.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

19 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2017–2025). Reported award amounts total $22,272,846. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.