SBIR/STTR Research Award

Frequency and Phase Locking of Magnetrons Using Varactor Diodes

Award identifier 3a823fc26ac8c53e5c33b03c23a20415a8b0dbedd113b086a5570093354f9ef2Awarding agency Department of Defense · Navy

Award amount

$239,963

Program and phase

STTR · Phase I

Award year

2020

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Navy
Recipient company
CALABAZAS CREEK RESEARCH, INC.
Proposal award date
2020-07-17
Contract end date
2021-12-15
UEI
M3LBSJNCR1Z5
Solicitation number
A
Topic code
N20A-T015

Research abstract

Magnetrons are compact, inexpensive, and highly efficient sources of RF power used in many industrial and commercial applications. For most of these applications, the requirement is for RF power without regard to precise frequency or phase control, and noise riding on the RF signal is not important. For many accelerator, defense, and communications applications, however, these characteristics prevent use of magnetrons. It is possible to control frequency, phase, and noise by locking the output to a reference RF signal directed into the magnetron output. This requires a circulator to protect the RF source providing the locking signal. Unfortunately, circulators are large, often expensive component that prevents installation in compact or mobile applications. This program proposes to use varactor diodes to frequency and phase lock the magnetron RF power. The program will investigate two approaches. The first approach is to insert reactive components into the magnetron resonant structure to convert the magnetron into a voltage-controlled oscillator. The fast tuning speed of the varactor diode will provide rapid frequency tuning offer a significant bandwidth. The requirement is to use a varactor that can tolerate the high RF frequency and power loading. This approach incorporates simple hardware with high loop bandwidth and lower cost than previous investigations. No RF power is required to lock the magnetron, and no circulator is required. The second approach incorporates varactor diodes into a cavity coupled to the external waveguide that generates a controlled reflection toward the magnetron. The advantage of this approach is that no modifications are required to the magnetron with the mechanical and electrical issues that entails. The Phase I program will simulate performance in an S-Band magnetron currently in production. The program will investigate mechanical issues associated with integrating the diode into the RF circuit to provide the required performance, and perform experiments to test the external cavity approach. If the results demonstrate feasiblilty, it will be proposed to build and test a varactor controlled, S-Band magnetron producing more than 5 MW CW in the Phase II program.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

138 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1995–2024). Reported award amounts total $43,761,170. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Energy, Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Science Foundation

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.