SBIR/STTR Research Award

Non-Immunogenic PEG-like Conjugates of Uricase

Award identifier db4196bacdf58f44355ee12c7f660ed2627ff7c41e4a89cc3076db992d208906Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$288,472

Program and phase

STTR · Phase I

Award year

2020

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
Gateway Bio, Inc.
Proposal award date
2020-07-16
Contract end date
2021-07-15
UEI
MLZ9QD9YXCN7
Solicitation number
PA19-270
Topic code
NCATS

Research abstract

ABSTRACT Covalent conjugation of therapeutic peptides and proteins with the “stealth” polymer poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG), termed PEGylation, is a widely used approach to increase the circulation half-life and stability of “biologics” —peptide, protein and oligonucleotide drugs— and to reduce their immunogenicity. However, recent studies show that PEG is itself immunogenic, as anti-PEG antibodies have been induced in patients treated with some PEGylated drugs, and circulating anti-PEG antibodies have also been found in individuals naïve to PEGylated therapeutics, possibly induced by chronic exposure to PEGs present in consumer products. Motivated by this compelling clinical need and commercial opportunity, the overall objective of this STTR proposal is to develop biologic conjugates of a novel PEG-like polymer — poly(oligoethyene glycol methyl methacrylate) (POEGMA), wherein the PEG chain is distributed as short oligoethylene glycol (OEG) oligomers along a polymer backbone (Fig. 1) — to eliminate PEGandapos;s immunogenicity while preserving its ability to prolong plasma half life. The outcome of this project, if successful, will be the identification of a POEGMA conjugate with the same or better activity as the linear PEG conjugate, but with minimal PEG antigenicity and reduced overall immunogenicity, thereby providing a next-generation technology that is superior to PEGylation.PROJECT NARRATIVE PEGylation —the conjugation of polyethylene glycol (PEG) to biologics— is commonly used to overcome the short plasma half-life of peptide and protein drugs. However, PEG is now known to be immunogenic, and anti-PEG antibodies are present in ~50% of the US population, likely due to the ubiquitous use of PEG in common consumer products. Anti-PEG antibodies have led to the early termination of a Phase III clinical trial of a PEGylated drug candidate and have caused several PEGylated drugs to be withdrawn from the market because of severe allergic reactions in some patients. This application proposes to eliminate the negative interaction of PEGylated therapeutics with anti-PEG antibodies by developing “PEG-like” POEGMA conjugates that do not interact with anti- PEG antibodies.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

5 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2017–2025). Reported award amounts total $2,461,707. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.