SBIR/STTR Research Award

Neural Net Control for Electric Propulsion in 3-Body Orbits

Award identifier 5596d0c67f3f0dc8a66cd06fef68a28274e9799263273e2de62b94ca451f4c9fAwarding agency National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Award amount

$749,237

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2020

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
ADVANCED SPACE LLC
Proposal award date
2020-07-10
Contract end date
2022-07-09
UEI
EFK8T9QULJM9
Solicitation number
SBIR_19_P2
Topic code
H9

Research abstract

The proposed innovation, neural networks (NNs) for electric propulsion (EP) mdash; NNEP, leverages the fundamental principles of optimal control (OC) and a rich field of recent advancements in the area of artificial intelligence to automate spacecraft maneuver correction, resulting in improved spacecraft maneuver accuracy, lowered operations complexity, and cost savings. NNs are used as function approximators, learning the complex relationship between spacecraft state and the costates defining the OC to return to a reference trajectory.nbsp;The NNEP technology builds on the variety of technologies that exist for onboard navigation (such as GPS, CAPS, or OpNav). Once the spacecraft has generated a state estimate, it evaluates a pre-trained NN to find the corresponding costates (non-physical terms created in the process of solving an OC problem). The NNEP technology maps state errors to costates because the costates are always smoothly-varying, even for non-smooth OC. Within seconds of the nav update, the spacecraft autonomously determines the control required for the next several days and checks for constraint violations.The NNEP technology consists of both a novel application of NNs to relevant astrodynamics problems and an architecture for implementing this technology in real operational environments and in flight software (FSW). A proof of concept of the technology was developed during Phase I, including demonstration of the building blocks for a FSWnbsp;implementation. Phase II funding will mature the technology further and result in a prototype FSW implementation running on representative space hardware.nbsp;Many research groups are now investigating the use of NNs to automate spacecraft trajectory corrections. NNEP combines Advanced Spacersquo;s practical institutional experience of mission design, navigation, and operations for a wide variety of cutting-edge space missions with the powerful theoretical advantages of NNs and OC.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

30 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2015–2025). Reported award amounts total $13,857,121. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Defense

Contractor profile

ADVANCED SPACE LLC

Historical federal award activity, when published, is on that contractor profile. Matched by UEI only.

Agency intelligence

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

NAICS intelligence

This classification comes from the contractor profile, not from the SBIR award record.

Contractor industry classification NAICS 541512

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.