SBIR/STTR Research Award

Electrical & Thermal Energy Storage in Geothermal Plants

Award identifier e3777512883cacfe2619b72c5a8c86ff9788b30056642e1abd39d3c006533083Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$199,956

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2020

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
NRGTEK, INC.
Proposal award date
2020-06-29
Contract end date
2021-03-28
UEI
H4HATZ6CKUK5
Solicitation number
DEFOA0002146
Topic code
10a

Research abstract

Geothermal energy is one of America’s best choices as a low-cost renewable energy resource for power generation. By adding energy storage capability to geothermal resources, the power produced/offset can be dispatched as necessary based on changing grid conditions, further expanding the usage and utility of geothermal energy. The proposed energy storage system for capture of both electrical energy (in a non-battery system) and low-temperature thermal energy (≤ 150oC) would be an ideal extension to the capabilities of existing geothermal power-plants. Deployment of advanced geothermal energy storage contributes to grid reliability, flexibility, resilience and security, and also supports DOE’s Grid Modernization Initiative. Geothermal plants have both electrical energy and thermal energy. The electrical energy produced in geothermal plants cannot be stored cost-effectively by battery-based systems. Low-temperature heat emitted from geothermal plants also cannot currently be stored and converted to power efficiently. This project will use osmotic solutions to store both electrical and thermal energy, to produce power on demand in high-pressure hydro-turbines. During the storage cycle, high concentration osmotic solutions are produced from electrical and thermal energy. During the generation cycle, the osmotic energy is converted to hydraulic energy to produce power from hydro-turbines on demand. Nrgtek has already developed the technology for conversion of low-temperature energy to hydro-electric power, using thermolytic polymers with high osmotic potential. In Phase I, we will further optimize these osmotic polymers, and also develop technology for regeneration of high osmotic-potential ionic solutions, using a process called Continuous Electro Deionization (CEDI), to store surplus electrical energy as concentrated ionic solutions. Integration of both systems will enable storage of both thermal and electrical energy for on-demand power production in hydro-turbines. Long-duration energy storage for geothermal, industrial and renewable energy applications, wherever electrical and low-temperature thermal energy is available. Non-geothermal applications include industrial CHP and WHP systems, solar-thermal plants, CO2 capture and conventional power-plants, with attendant carbon credits.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

4 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2010–2023). Reported award amounts total $2,597,300. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase II, Phase I

Agencies: Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.