SBIR/STTR Research Award

Photovoltaic Modules with No Back Sheet

Award identifier 6170fab8078893502d1c87b06ffb11887791794270750ef6bf834a154d2aa913Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$122,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2020

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
Plains Cupid, LLC
Proposal award date
2020-06-29
Contract end date
2021-06-28
UEI
WGSGDPJT3VX5
Solicitation number
DEFOA0002146
Topic code
11b

Research abstract

The research and development of this project is related to photovoltaic (PV) modules with no back sheet. The typical PV module consists of a glass sheet, ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) as encapsulant, crystalline silicon (c-Si) solar cells that are inter-connected in series and a back sheet. A team in Japan reported that minimizing the concentration of acetic acid which is generated by hydrolysis of EVA is the key issue for high reliability (28th EU PVSEC p.2828, M. Miyashita). To minimize the concentration of acetic acid, one approach is to use back sheets of extremely low water vapor transmission rate (WVTR), such as back sheets with Aluminum layer. However, those back sheets increase the cost of modules. Another approach can be to use back sheets of extremely high acetic acid transmission rate or to use no back sheet, so that low concentration of acetic acid in the modules can be maintained. As far as manufacturing cost is concerned, the approach of no back sheet is very attractive. Therefore, Plains Cupid, LLC has been focusing on and studying the concept of No Back Sheet modules. After the latest two years’ study, what we confirmed include the initial module output is the same as the conventional, better reliability from Dump Heat test, significant potential of cost reduction with less material consumption, about 10% lighter module weight. Our latest experimental results show that some types of NBS modules have good reliability. However, the other kinds of NBS modules have poor reliability (Figure1). The poor reliability seems to be because of corrosion of metals on the rear side of solar cells (Figure2). In this project, what to be done on No Back Sheet Modules include; optimize rear side structure, treatments and materials for cost reduction, confirm and optimize output and reliability (Thermal Cycle test and Dump Heat test), find the best process and machine for mass production. For the conventional module, the cost of a back sheet and EVA is about $10.4 in total per module (1.8m x 1.0m). With the new concept, we found that the cost of $10.4 will be reduced to $4.3/module, which means $6.1/module cost reduction. Besides the cost benefit, the modules are expected for higher manufacturing yield due to no mechanical stress from back sheets as well as better reliability as shown Figure1 NBS1. The light weight of the modules would be a good benefit for Roof Top usage.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.