SBIR/STTR Research Award

Near Infrared Biomass Probe and Deployment Methods for Real-time, Field-Based, Biomass Quality Measurement

Award identifier fafe232ef17ed01d1b2650dc9749f0a09a30a20169df391c78ac30be74086156Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$200,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2020

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
Antares Group Incorporated
Proposal award date
2020-06-29
Contract end date
2021-03-28
UEI
VEKFLLDJHHF6
Solicitation number
DEFOA0002146
Topic code
07b

Research abstract

Statement of problem: Efficient and economic biomass quality assessment is a critical area of need for cellulosic biorefinery operations. If an economic, field-deployable quality measurement system and method becomes commercially available, improvements in delivered feedstock quality will be more achievable by allowing for quality improvements to be made in the field throughout the harvest season. How problem will be addressed: Team members have developed and demonstrated a novel methodfor use of a near infrared (NIR) probe to sample biomass in the field (in bales, piles, etc.) for measuring moisture, ash, glucan, and xylan content in harvested biomass. While our team has successfully demonstrated the feasibility of the probe at a proof-of-concept level, there is significant work required to enable reliable probe deployment in a commercially viable manner. What will be accomplished with Phase I funding: We will work with truck-mounted hydraulic bale coring equipment developed and used by Iowa State, converting the system from a material coring and extraction operation to a NIR probe insertion operation. We will improve methods for NIR measurement to be consistent with commercial applications and expand the range of biomass types that it can be used with. The biomass probe design will be improved from its current proof-of-concept design, to a rugged design that will be capable of withstanding thousands of cycles between major parts replacement (quartz window, probe shaft, fiber optic cables, etc.). We will also work with team members for develop detailed plans for commercializing the NIR probe and deployment methods. Commercial applications and other benefits: For abiorefinery operation procuring about300,000 dry tons of biomass, if an in-field real-time quality measurement system can be coupled with other harvest and supply chain management actions to facilitate a reduction in average ash content from 12 percent to 5 percent on average, our team estimates an annual cost savings of about $3.5 million, or about $11.50 per dry ton. If average ash is improved from 8 percent to 5 percent, we have estimated the annual cost savings at more than $1.5 million per year or about $5 per dry ton.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

5 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1993–2021). Reported award amounts total $1,922,987. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Transportation, Department of Energy, Department of Education

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.