SBIR/STTR Research Award

Antibody Drug Conjugate (ADC) Workbench

Award identifier edee916c81906653d7105e449c0a3c06c1964138e4d881f135e865f2e371632dAwarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$1,483,982

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Award year

2020

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
Applied BioMath, LLC
Proposal award date
2020-06-01
Contract end date
2023-05-31
UEI
XNW9KMW3DLM7
Solicitation number
PA19-272
Topic code
300

Research abstract

Project Summary/Abstract Antibody-Drug Conjugates (ADCs) are an exciting class of targeted anti-cancer therapeutics, combining the selectivity and specificity of biologics (monoclonal antibodies) with the potent cytotoxic activity of small molecule payloads. While proven to yield clinical benefit in different cancer types (5 ADCs have been approved by the FDA), many molecules fail in late stage clinical testing. The fine balance of anti-tumor activity vs. toxicity ultimately originates from the ADC ‘design space’: the choices of target, backbone (usually monoclonal antibodies (mAb)), linker chemistry, cytotoxic payload, and drug-to-antibody ratio (DAR) make for a vast number of possible combinations that cannot be fully explored experimentally. ADCs are thus currently designed empirically, often based on variations of existing ADCs, supported by very limited and highly-imperfect pre-clinical assays, and clinical dosing schedules selected from sparse human toxicity data. Mechanism-based computational models that could synthesize the different preclinical mechanistic data to predict human efficacy and toxicity, and anticipate the therapeutic index (TI) of novel ADCs in silico would be highly valuable to guide both molecule design during early development, and clinical decisions. Specifically, if target selection and candidate screening could be performed computationally, better ADCs would be taken into clinical testing. Similarly, if the effect of alternate dosing schedules and patient populations could be evaluated pre-emptively, molecules that enter clinical testing would have a higher chance of success, trials would be accelerated, and clinical benefit would be improved. We propose developing a Quantitative Systems Pharmacology (QSP)-based platform ADC model that could do so - the ADC Workbench. By integrating the disparate body of data and biological knowledge available for successful ADCs into one platform model, the ADC Workbench will enable systematic candidate evaluation based on simulated clinical activity and toxicity (i.e., the TI). Leads with a poor chance of success will be weeded out early, and those with better prospects taken forward. The ADC Workbench will allow dosing schedules to be evaluated in large numbers of diverse virtual patient populations, providing a rational approach to clinical trial designs that maximize TI. The platform will be constructed in a modular way so that innovative new ADC molecules (e.g. with novel mAB backbones, linkers or payloads) can be incorporated as data becomes available. The ADC Workbench tool will be preloaded with several parameter sets for approved ADC molecules and their individual components (mAB, linker, payload), to allow for rapid in silico prototyping and benchmarking of potential new candidates. Continuous improvements to the built-in parameter database will be made as more data of clinical success and failure becomes available. Combining the model- and parameter database with the powerful high performance computing (HPC) analysis tools of Applied BioMath’s cloud based simulation engine will allow for routine and timely contribution to the ADC drug discovery process. 1 of 1

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

6 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2016–2023). Reported award amounts total $5,097,414. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II – Direct to Phase II, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.