SBIR/STTR Research Award

Methodologies and Tools for Securing Medical Device Systems in Integrated Clinical Environments (ICE)

Award identifier 3c1e351342f8922e137ac3c3a7b7ef6f7a0b4575e0bbb6db67c29574a0a2ffaeAwarding agency Department of Defense · Army

Award amount

$637,240

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2020

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Army
Recipient company
REAL-TIME INNOVATIONS, INC.
Proposal award date
2020-04-30
Contract end date
2023-07-31
UEI
H293LTV8R2U3
Solicitation number
15.1
Topic code
DHP15-004

Research abstract

Our grand vision is to enable the deployment of patient-centric and context-aware networked medical systems in all care environments, ranging from homes and general hospital floors to the operating rooms and intensive care units. These systems would securely connect to a local or remote healthcare network enabling real-time continuous monitoring.  Devices such as injection pumps can also be connected, and securely controlled.  Heterogeneous devices in each care environment would interoperate efficiently, safely, and securely to minimize preventable errors that are often induced unknowingly by human operators. As medical devices move between different care environments or from patient to patient, they would securely discover other devices that they need to interoperate with and verify and run safe, authorized, and compliant operational profiles. Our grand vision also includes the ability to incorporate continuing degrees of autonomous healthcare as part of the virtual healthcare network. The key to realizing this vision is to come up with standardized architectures and interfaces that balance utility, reliability, and safety requirements with those of security and privacy. The ICE standard [3] is definitely a step in the right direction, however, it does not yet explicitly address scalability and security concerns. Security considerations for interconnected and dynamically composable medical systems are critical not only because laws such as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) [4] mandate it, but also because security attacks can have serious safety consequences for patients. Since interoperable medical systems are dynamically composed, there is an additional need for security mechanisms that allow for automatic verification that system components are being used as intended in the clinical context, and that they have been cleared for safety and effectiveness.  In order to enable the kind of scalability that will be required, advances will be required to ensure that these systems based upon the ICE protocol and built on RTI’s technology foundation can securely and reliably connect to the virtual healthcare network.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

90 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1995–2025). Reported award amounts total $36,533,532. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Energy, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Commerce

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.