SBIR/STTR Research Award

Multi-Moded Multi-Frequency Fast Single Bunch Beam Diagnostic Instrument

Award identifier 0151c49da3f3ce8d5dffd9595d1029389637f6517aa0e0346664dd80470e7c68Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$1,000,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2020

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
TIBARAY, INC.
Proposal award date
2020-04-06
Contract end date
2022-04-05
UEI
YMJ7WMKNYDJ5
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0002155
Topic code
09a

Research abstract

Although beam control is critical to the optimal operation of accelerators, both for the large systems that exists in national and international laboratories and for industrial and medical accelerators, it is compromised by the high costs of diagnostic detectors and the need for information from multiple detectors to generate a complete picture of what is happening to the beam. Moreover, some of the measurements are destructive to the beam or take a long time to interpret results. Ideally one would like to design and build a fast, non-destructive beam monitor that can provide beam intensity, position and size information almost instantaneously and be able to operate fast enough to diagnose individual beam bunches. Making such devices economically enough for widespread use is also required, it is no use to make a “perfect” system if it is unaffordable. We propose to create cavity monitors in which the azimuthal symmetry is perturbed and hence the different polarizations of the dipole and quadrupole modes are shifted in frequency. Adding this additional frequency information to the amplitudes will allow a single cavity to provide at least five pieces of information related to the charge, the horizontal and vertical dipole modes and the two polarizations of the quadrupole modes. This novel solution can provide for a compact device that can non-destructively monitor the beam position, size and eventually emittance at high repetition rates. Moreover, installing multiple monitors in a FODO lattice in a machine such as LCLS-II will allow fast emittance measurements. The proposed beam monitor will be fast, compact, economical and be capable of non-destructive measurement of beam parameters. These qualities will allow for more widespread use in the ~1500 or so medical and industrial linacs manufactured per year leading to better monitoring of output radiation of these systems, especially medical radiation therapy systems where beam monitoring can be critical to operation. Often the manufactures of such systems will forgo meaningful beam diagnostics for cost reasons. The large accelerator laboratories also have need for fast, non-destructive beam diagnostics for better beam tuning as they strive for better quality beams needed for ultimate performance.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

16 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2017–2024). Reported award amounts total $11,165,141. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Energy, Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.