SBIR/STTR Research Award

Low temperature thermionic electron source with narrow energy spread

Award identifier 3e30935c0c0adf2aada0fadacbf925c1359f65591dae1ca82045ed97b4401f74Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$1,047,767

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2020

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
SPARK THERMIONICS, INC.
Proposal award date
2020-04-06
Contract end date
2022-04-05
UEI
KRKLH5NVNW95
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0002155
Topic code
15c

Research abstract

A major challenge in the field of electron microscopy is to reach energy resolution as low as 1 meV, which would improve the performance of currently used technologies and facilitate the development of novel techniques. The main roadblock limiting these developments are the currently available electron sources, which can only achieve resolution of 10 meV, an achievement that is already linked to major stability and maintenance issues. We propose to develop a radically new type of electron source based on thermionic emission near room temperature. While thermionic emission is typically a very high temperature process, we have developed a technique to lower virtually any material’s work function to levels which we propose could enable thermionic emission of electrons near room temperature. Besides the lower complexity of a room temperature emitter, lowering the temperature also results in a much narrower kinetic energy distribution compared to cold field emitters. This new type of electron source will allow microscopes to surpass current resolution limits will accelerate and enable the development of new microscopy techniques. During Phase I of this project, we confirmed that the applied mechanism and materials can achieve work functions low enough for thermionic emission close to room temperature and, in fact, what believe to be the lowest work function that has ever been measured. In Phase II of the proposed project, we will (1) extend work functions measurements to identify material combinations to achieve ultra-low work functions, (2) quantify the energy distributions from thermionic electron emission close to room temperature, and (3) assemble a contained electron source prototype. The expected energy resolutions could transform the field of electron microscopy and not only improve existing technologies, but also facilitate the development of new techniques, such as multi-dimensional atomic scale microscopes, enhanced characterization of quantum materials, and high-speed dynamic electron microscopy methods. These novel techniques are likely to be used not only at research institutions but could also quickly find their way into industrial applications, e.g. in the semiconductor and bioscience sectors.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

17 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2017–2025). Reported award amounts total $8,078,623. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.