SBIR/STTR Research Award

Bond Inspection of Bonded Composite Repairs During Depot Level Maintenance

Award identifier cb30767fcd37862e164149cc73afcca5f652892e53bda3d0800c7538b249171dAwarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$49,999

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2020

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
LSP Technologies, Inc.
Proposal award date
2020-03-09
Contract end date
2020-06-09
UEI
ECLMZGD2BVN3
Solicitation number
X20.1
Topic code
J201-CSO1

Research abstract

The US Air Force is undertaking process improvements for bonded repairs on C-130 aircraft wings.  These repairs are both composite and metal patches which are bonded to the wing surfaces primarily at points where corrosion, gouges, or other surface damage has been removed.  Patch materials are commonly boron fiber epoxy pre-impregnated composite and titanium with high temperature epoxy film adhesive.  The intention of the patches is to recover the strength lost from material removal. These patch repairs save hundreds of millions of dollars in repair by eliminating the need to complete a full component replacement. Present process control emphasizes surface preparation as the primary means of controlling repair quality and bond strength.  To date, thermographic inspection is the only means, aside from visual inspection, that is used to judge the quality of the bonded repair patch installations.  This is only done at the initial patch installation since this method requires heating of the patch and is perceived as posing a risk for degradation of patches that have seen flight service.  Review of historic inspection data indicates that patch delamination occurs frequently enough that inspection process improvement may result in a net reduction of maintenance hours expended.  The current nondestructive inspection techniques involving ultrasonic inspection are not capable of determining bond strength for certification of bonded structures, limiting bonded joint acceptance for critical structures like composite patch repairs. Two USAF organizations have interest in bonded repair process improvement.  The C-130 SPO is the operational safety, suitability, and effectiveness (OSS&E) authority for the fleet.  Engineers from this organization are responsible for assuring that bonded repair application will result in continued safe aircraft operation and that maintenance on the repaired areas is minimized.  AFLCMC/CMXG is the maintenance organization that employs specified processes for initial damage removal, bonded patch installation, initial and periodic inspections, and rework or replacement when required.  Laser Bond Inspection (LBI) is potentially beneficial to both of these groups since the anticipated gain in initial bonded patch quality would serve to enhance overall aircraft safety and minimize rework at the point of patch installation as well as reducing patch replacement, since patch integrity could conceivably be nondestructively determined. The investments made by Industry and Government to generate data and build the various LBI system components to conduct this inspection process can be leveraged to support this proposed Phase I for maturation and implementation for the inspection of bonded composite patch repairs.  LBI can be used to validate the integrity of repairs that are made to either a metallic or composite aircraft by identifying weak bonded repairs and to detect the presence of “kissing bonds.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

33 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1995–2023). Reported award amounts total $16,534,695. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.