SBIR/STTR Research Award

Rapid Satellite Propulsion System Acceptance Testing for USAF Missions

Award identifier f5449d75c94d16f8c7a6b1893ee7aa183acc2c326eb150450951c61d58b56367Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$44,271

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2020

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
APOLLO FUSION, INC.
Proposal award date
2020-03-09
Contract end date
2020-06-09
UEI
M9TBLNKQG7J7
Solicitation number
X20.1
Topic code
J201-CSO1

Research abstract

On January 11, 2007 China conducted its first anti-satellite missile test, deliberately destroying another Chinese satellite.  It demonstrated the vulnerability of US satellites to enemy combatants.  Critical satellites could be destroyed, reducing US military coverage until the satellite is replaced.  It can take more than 2 years to build, launch, and replace a non-operational satellite.  High delta-V (or highly mobile) satellites would reduce the replacement time to as little as weeks: satellites in one orbit could be moved to another.  Low delta-V capacity hinders DoD programs such as the LEO missile warning layer, ISR (intelligence, surveillance, reconnaissance) layer, and LEO communications.   Electric propulsion can solve this problem by providing high delta-V capacity to small satellites.  Commercial satellite manufacturers recognize these benefits: over 500 commercial small satellites use electric propulsion.  The first US commercial satellite to use electric propulsion launched in 2004; since then only 2 AFRL technology demonstration missions have used electric propulsion on small satellites.  The US military has found it difficult to integrate and test electric propulsion. Apollo Fusion's ACE Max electric propulsion system is an engine for satellites.  ACE Max allows every satellite to be a highly mobile satellite, by providing high delta-V capability at low cost with fast and easy integration into customer satellites.  ACE Max is a complete propulsion system including a Hall thruster, PPU, robust software, a space-heritage tank, and a propellant feed system.  Satellites with ACE Max are 10 times more mobile than typical Air Force satellites.  Numerous USAF missions are delayed because of the time it takes to complete Acceptance Testing (continuity, isolation, vibe, performance, TVAC, thermal cycles, etc.) of the propulsion system.  Apollo has developed a process for more quickly completing this testing on a satellite panel that has the prop system already integrated.  The system is delivered to satellite manufacturers fully assembled and acceptance tested by Apollo Fusion, with no further testing required by the satellite integrator.  This unique approach reduces the time and cost to integrate our electric propulsion system by approximately 75% compared to traditional approaches.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

3 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2020–2022). Reported award amounts total $3,007,932. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase II, Phase I

Agencies: Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.