SBIR/STTR Research Award

Lunar Surface Network and Kinetic Delivery System

Award identifier 918ebcdfa7742837ad3e371de3acc965a8783d79167ecb72d91b8b3ee3a0f2b5Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$49,999

Program and phase

STTR · Phase I

Award year

2020

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
SPACE INITIATIVES INC.
Proposal award date
2020-03-06
Contract end date
2020-06-04
UEI
KHBBGA8K7ED6
Solicitation number
20.A
Topic code
AF20A-TCSO1

Research abstract

We propose a mesh network system that can be deployed onto the lunar surface either with or, in advance of a new landing, either crewed or robotic, that can provide the following services: terminal navigation and landing positioning, even in the possible presence of hostile jamming or spoofing; local PNT for astronauts and robots over an area surrounding the landing site; communications relay over that same area; and site security/intrusion detection. This system will be self-constructing after being dropped into place (e.g. from orbit), inexpensive, and require low- or zero-maintenance. The system will also be expandable to larger areas or to link existing areas of coverage, e.g. two separated landing sites. It should also have the ability to patch into satellite/spacecraft communications networks to augment the main-site communications capabilities.   It will help rovers which enter the coverage area.    Each node will be encapsulated in a small (50 to 100 mm long) kinetic penetrator designed to survive and operate following an un-braked fall following dispensing from the host spacecraft. The nodes, each of which has on-board processing, communications, imaging and other sensors, would be carried on the host spacecraft within a standard COTS (Commercial off the shelf) Cubesat dispenser. The lander performs its main braking burn about 20 km kilometers above the lunar surface then continue to gently decelerate.   At ~5 km altitude the dispenser would eject the node carrier, then within a minute or two the nodes would be individually ejected from that carrier thus dispersing the nodes in an appropriate pattern. Following deployment, the nodes establish a local network using Ultra-Wide Band (UWB) RF (Radio Frequency signal), estimating direction and distance between each node as they fall to the lunar surface. After descent of about 2 minutes the nodes impact into the lunar surface at about 200 meters/sec.   After impact, the nodes re-establish the local network using both low-frequency RF (1-10 MHz [Megahertz] which can penetrate lunar regolith) and the UWB link (where possible), and use their onboard RF and imaging systems to determine their relative positions to each other and the lunar surface from surface features and astronomical sightings.  Phase I will describe how a small mesh network of nodes can survive an un-braked fall to the lunar surface from altitude & rapidly self-deploy & establish their network.   We will perform Preliminary Analysis, modeling and simulation of key system elements and network functionality.  Subcontractor Florida Institute of Technology (FIT) will perform orbital analysis and impact analysis.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.