SBIR/STTR Research Award

HPChain: Energy-Efficient Scalable Blockchains for HPC Systems

Award identifier 5db23919adf729a89d1d48259cb7f7d767e228d9dd4187fe2ba646c94d343f40Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$200,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2020

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
Moka Blox LLC
Proposal award date
2020-02-18
Contract end date
2020-11-17
UEI
NXSFRPHTLX43
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0002145
Topic code
03a

Research abstract

Statement of the problem: HPC cybersecurity needs to diversify for increasing academic and industrial usages, especially for decentralized and distributed throughputs between HPC implementations. Blockchains can provide increased cybersecurity for HPC activities by using alternative blockchain proofs different from the ones used by simple amateur networks, and with some modifications can provide suitable academic and industrial cybersecurity in an energy-efficient manner without major disruptions of larger system activities. We have invented a new type of blockchain proof that improves HPC securitization and energy efficiency, as well as developed a platform for managing several optimization algorithms using some limited machine learning. Our blockchain proof also facilitates large-scale processes typical of HPCs and their internal energy analysis, integrating multiple HPC service components ito support distributed and decentralized service-oriented blockchain and non-blockchain activities between HPCs to further remove requirements for HPC colocation and support cloud architectures. We will optimize and develop our blockchain proof, develop and benchmark our selection of optimization algorithms, and develop and benchmark our cybersecurity protocols for security escalation using a mixture of commercial facility data and scientific/academic data. Several types of security escalation tests will be performed in conjunction with several types of simulated attacks, and energy efficiencies and vulnerabilities will be evaluated posthumously. A draft blockchain cybersecurity framework will be created that identifies similarities with NIST and DoD cybersecurity frameworks, and where advancements or divergences may be more appropriate when dealing with HPCs and blockchains. We will target commercial/industrial HPCs, such as used at universities and national infrastructure facilities, as well as other HPC cybersecurity targets, such as power plants, telecenters, healthcare contractors, financial transaction systems, weather modeling services, and first responder networks as greater HPC usage, colocation, and decentralization/cloud services will continue in those high-volume industries, all of which will necessitate radically improved HPC interconnectivity and securitization.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

2 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2020–2022). Reported award amounts total $455,916. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I

Agencies: National Science Foundation, Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.