SBIR/STTR Research Award

A Next Generation, Low Cost Tracking System for Healthcare Process Validation (2)

Award identifier d0c41d8aa613018a6de19a82b70b3df798409dad5704b265309211164a942e52Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$1,187,475

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2019

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
GAN CORPORATION
Proposal award date
2019-09-26
Contract end date
2021-06-30
UEI
KSKJNLG2VNB4
Solicitation number
PA18-573
Topic code
600

Research abstract

PROJECT SUMMARY Significance: Americaandapos;s health care system remains challenged by tens of billions of dollars of fraud and inefficiencies. Lost and stolen equipment cost about $4,000 per hospital bed, increasing to $8,000 when expenses incurred from out-of-place equipment are added. In addition, a 2017 report estimates $95 billion was lost to fraud, waste, abuse, and other improper payments in the Medicare and Medicaid programs. Real Time Location Systems (RTLS) are an emerging technology that promises to increase the visibility and efficiency of clinical workflows. There is no clear market leader. Low-cost solutions have poor accuracy, and high-accuracy solutions are too expensive. For instance, The Veteran Administrationandapos;s $543 million foray into medical RTLS has been deemed “a catastrophic failure.” The problem and opportunity are highly significant. Investigator(s): Dr. Hans G. Schantz of Q-Track has more than forty patents and managed over $10 million in sponsored research at Q-Track. Professors Jung Hyup Kim and Laurel Despins at the University of Missouri will evaluate and optimize the proposed innovations with respect to clinical end-user needs. Innovation: Q-Trackandapos;s pioneering low-frequency approach to indoor location – Near-Field Electromagnetic Ranging (NFER) provides sub-meter accurate location results in the most challenging environments including a third of U.S. nuclear plants, health care facilities, military training sites, and other industrial facilities. Cost has limited adoption to broader markets. This effort aimed to achieve a radical reduction in cost by a factor of two. In Phase 1, Q-Track dramatically demonstrated feasibility, lowering the retail price of a Locator-Receiver from $2750 to $600, while maintaining 40 cm or better accuracy. Taking an existing NFER RTLS deployment at the Intensive Care Unit at the University Hospital, University of Missouri Health Care in Columbia, Missouri as a baseline, Q-Trackandapos;s Phase 1 success drives the overall NFER RTLS cost from $2191/bed to $1474/bed. Phase 2 builds on this successful outcome with sub-meter accurate, low cost (andlt;$1000/bed), RTLS using an innovative low-frequency approach. In Phase 2, we lower the cost of the QTag location tag in a redesign. We compliment sub-meter accurate medical personnel tracking with Asset Tag Tracking capability using $1-$2 Bluetooth Low Energy active asset tags. We further implement user-centric data analytics to understand and characterize health care operations. U.S. Patent 8,326,451 further describes Q-Trackandapos;s innovative approach. Approach: Finally, we will collaborate with academic researchers to deploy a pilot at an Intensive Care Unit. Our pilot will track medical personnel and assets. Our study assesses the ability of the system to characterize, optimize, and validate health care operation in real-world settings to detect fraud and achieve efficiencies. Environment: Our partnership with Dr. Kim and the ICU at the University Hospital, University of Missouri Health Care in Columbia, Missouri ensures real-world feedback in an operational health care setting.PROJECT NARRATIVE Americaandapos;s health care system remains challenged by tens of billions of dollars of fraud and inefficiencies. Real Time Location Systems (RTLS) are an emerging technology that that promise to increase the visibility and operational efficiency of clinical workflows, however adoption has been limited by poor performance and high cost. This Phase 2 effort builds on a successful Phase 1 outcome to deliver a sub-meter accurate, low cost (andlt;$1000/bed), RTLS using an innovative low-frequency approach to the problem, combined with user- centric data analytics to characterize, optimize, and validate health care operation, so as to achieve tens of billions of dollars in fraud reduction and process improvements.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

6 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2019–2022). Reported award amounts total $2,923,573. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Health and Human Services

Contractor profile

GAN CORPORATION

Historical federal award activity, when published, is on that contractor profile. Matched by UEI only.

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

NAICS intelligence

This classification comes from the contractor profile, not from the SBIR award record.

Contractor industry classification NAICS 541512

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.