SBIR/STTR Research Award

Sensor Network with Active Instructional Content to Prevent Child Safety Seat Misuse

Award identifier 4539d690c204d335d66cf2455c248b0dc5b469089dd9416ab754eb80364c9610Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$224,939

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2019

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
Minnesota HealthSolutions Corporation
Proposal award date
2019-09-01
Contract end date
2020-08-31
UEI
G34WKGPA1M73
Solicitation number
PA18-573
Topic code
NICHD

Research abstract

Project Summary Abstract Minnesota HealthSolutionsMHSproposes to develop an innovative child safety seat user engagement system that aims to actively educateinstruct and alarm caregivers with the goal of preventing critical child safety seat misuses and injuries to children riding in motor vehiclesKey enabling technologies make the proposed system technically feasible at this timeMotor vehicle crashes are the leading cause of unintentional morbidity and mortality in American childrenIn the past ten yearsthousands of children have died in unintentional crashes and millions more had hospital treated injuriesProperly utilized child safety seats are the most effective way to protect young children involved in crashes from serious injury or death and the vast majority of children are seated in child safety seatsHoweverseveral large studies have observed that onlytoof children are correctly harnessed into correctly installed seatsImproper use of child restraints substantially reduces their effectiveness and is a major public health concernBetter systems are needed to improve the rate of proper child safety seat useWe hypothesize that the proposed child safety seat user engagement system will significantly improve the rate of proper child safety seat usage and reduce vehicle crash related child injuries and deathsAn interdisciplinary team of researchers has been assembled to definebuildand evaluate feasibilityand productionprototype systems in phase I and phase IIrespectivelyThe phase II production prototype development will be completed in a rigorous quality controlled design and testing process to ensure a safe and effective product is produced Project Narrative The population of interest for this device is virtually all child safety seat installers userswhich includes parentsgrandparentsand child care providersThe available market for the proposed device exceedsmillion units annually in the U SaloneThere are approximatelymillion childrenyears old and younger in the U SBy lawchildren in this age group must be restrained in a child safety seatThe proposed engagement instructional warning technology can provide benefit in nearly all of these seat installations

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

66 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2007–2025). Reported award amounts total $44,761,119. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Education, National Science Foundation

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.