SBIR/STTR Research Award

Stroke Assessment Suite

Award identifier 1469e690dced7982caa4fa1b01b1ff572f8dcb6608294893add45b09eb1859b7Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$224,406

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2019

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
HIGHLAND INSTRUMENTS INC
Proposal award date
2019-09-01
Contract end date
2020-08-31
UEI
YVB2H8MCWWX7
Solicitation number
PA18-574
Topic code
108

Research abstract

ProprietaryThis proposal includes trade secrets and other proprietary or confidential information of Highland Instruments and is being provided for use by the National Institutes of HealthNIHfor the sole purpose of evaluating this SBIR proposalNo other rights are conferredThis proposal andthe trade secrets and other proprietary or confidential information contained herein shal further not be disclosed in whole or in partsoutside of NIH without Highland Instrumentandapos s permissionThis restriction does not limit the NIHandapos s right to use information contained in the data if it is obtained fromanother source without restrictionThis legend applies to the AbstractSpecific AimsResearch Planal componentsCommercialization Planand Human Subjectandapos s Sections of this proposalAbstract The AHA Stroke Rehabilitation guideline states that in the current fiscal climatethe provision of comprehensive rehabilitation programs with adequate resourcesdoseand duration is an essential aspect of stroke care and should be a priorityWhile near and long term rehabilitation goals should be guided by patient baseline motor status and potential for motor recoveryacute motor assessment and prognostication remain a clinically difficult taskConventional clinical assessmentse gNIH Stroke ScaleFugl MeyerFMScalethat power prognosis are highly dependent on the initial severity and care provider point of careand often reduced further to even coarser prognostic scalese gOrpington Prognostic ScaleOPSOverall they lack the level of sophistication required to predict motor recovery and tailor rehabilitation due to ceiling effectsomission of fractionated and complex distal movementsand or unequal weighting of the two extremities in assessmentsFurthermoremany survivors do not even receive comprehensive assessments prior to dischargeand telestroke approaches which are being implemented to address such issues are limited in their scope of care and still not fully developed for functional assessmentsThis is critical becauseall patients benefit from a formal assessment of the patient s rehabilitation needs prior to dischargeTo address these and other limitations the AHA guidelines specifically call for the development ofcomputer adapted assessments for personalized and tailored interventionsnewer technologies such as body worn sensorsandbetter predictor models to identify responders and nonrespondersTo address these limitationswe propose to develop a system of multimodalintegrated sensorsi emotion capture camerasforce sensorsaccelerometersand gyroscopesthat will interface with a patient for recording their movementa software suite with signal processing and data fusion algorithms to reduce data dimensionality and provide kinematic kinetic based evaluationsand system software to trackclassifyand predict patient disease severityWe will test this computational Integrated sensor based Motion Analysis SuiteIMASinstroke patients undergoing IMAS directed motor evaluationsrepeatedtimes in aday periodwithindays post stroke andweeks post strokeafter having undergone rehabilitationfocused on assessments identified as important to patient independenceactivities of daily livingand ability to return to workQuantitative kinematic kinetic metrics descriptive of motor behavior will be derived from IMAS sensor recordings to characterize subjectsmotor performancee gjoint displacementvelocityaccelerationjerkand movement quality measuresThenwe will investigate the statistical relationships between the IMAS collected dataand with additional clinical data gathered during the patient assessments including demographicsimaging derived informationand FMOPSand Barthel index scoresto build statistical models toextract a low dimensional representation of disease statepredict the FM scaleandpredict likelihood of motor recovery following treatment Project Narrative Stroke is a major cause of death and the leading cause of disabilityIn the clinicthe lack of quantitativeobjective methods for outcome assessment and outcome prediction considerably hamper management of the diseaseultimately leading to sub optimal strategies for managing patient careThis study will develop a motion analysis suite for quantitativeobjective outcome assessment and prediction in stroke patients

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

19 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2008–2025). Reported award amounts total $17,502,850. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.