SBIR/STTR Research Award

Design and Validation of Dynamic Planning Algorithms to Enable Heterogeneous Airspace Operations and UAM

Award identifier 0e46251fb5a4986de8b040c4ed27c8d0777e31944f5a7290cadbf46e6f12ca41Awarding agency National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Award amount

$124,976

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2019

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
BARRON ASSOCIATES, INC.
Proposal award date
2019-08-19
Contract end date
2020-02-18
UEI
C8FUKQKC9JB4
Solicitation number
SBIR_19_P1
Topic code
A3

Research abstract

NASA has a bold new vision for future civil aviation ldquo;where anyone can safely fly anytime and anywhere with high confidence in a fraction of the time it takes today.rdquo; This includes Unmanned Aircraft System Traffic Management (UTM) which involves low altitude UAS operations in airspace not routinely controlled by the FAA and urban air mobility (UAM) which will involve a of a mix of autonomous, remotely piloted, and piloted air vehicles operating over populated urban areas. To enable the high-density mixed-use operations envisioned under UTM and UAM, a completely different approach to airspace management will be required. New planning algorithms are needed that can replace the cognition and decision-making capabilities of both the human pilot and air traffic controller. The overall goal of the Phase I research effort is to design a dynamic planning algorithm that is tailored to the unique challenges posed by UTM and UAM operations. The issue of algorithm validation will be considered from the onset, with a theoretical framework for assessing analytic guarantees of safety used to reduce the number of test cases required during simulation-based validation. During Phase I, the team will: (1) define a comprehensive set of safety requirements that must be addressed during path generation, (2) develop a proof-of-concept planning algorithm that meets the requirements, (3) assess the analytic guarantees of safety, and nbsp;(4) create an initial strategy for simulation-based validation that confirms the analytic guarantees provided by the planning algorithm and efficiently demonstrates that the safety requirements are met when analytic guarantees are not available. The resulting technology will begin to address how airspace operations can be scaled to an increasingly large number of aircraft with variable performance and control characteristics, including legacy users, while remaining robust to changing environmental conditions, congestion, and traffic avoidance.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

331 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1987–2025). Reported award amounts total $130,507,041. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Health and Human Services, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Commerce, Department of Education, Department of Energy

Contractor profile

BARRON ASSOCIATES, INC.

Historical federal award activity, when published, is on that contractor profile. Matched by UEI only.

Agency intelligence

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.