SBIR/STTR Research Award

AI-Based Side Channel Attack for EW Cyber Offense and Defense

Award identifier 47f5bd29c36c9e27550835a69b15c68c462856c7519ecd5fc6d971623a1719c5Awarding agency Department of Defense · Army

Award amount

$1,362,905

Program and phase

STTR · Phase II

Award year

2025

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Army
Recipient company
BLACK FUR INDUSTRIES LLC
Proposal award date
2025-09-24
Contract end date
2027-09-23
UEI
L651HKWYDGL1
Solicitation number
20.2
Topic code
A20-102

Research abstract

Unlike the previous and existing works, the Phase II effort will focus on anti-tampering, reverse engineering, obfuscation, and SCA hardening through plug-and-play. The core component is the deep neural network-based model for EM emission traces.  We plan to investigate SCA for EM and RF with deep neural networks (DNNs) at the architecture/circuit level, test SCA resiliency on existing embedded systems, and establish digital twins and test protocols for SCA hardenings.  We plan to integrate side-channel attack testing, fault Injections, cryptanalysis, electromagnetic (EM) spectrum analysis, wireless & wired Communication, and digital communication protocols in a set of generative pre-training models in the DNNs to guide automatic and secure embedded system designs. The technologies offered by Black Fur are unique: we develop DNNs that extend the cryptanalysis capabilities with real-time signals, power traces, EM spectrums, and other features that pertain to system performance. As is well known, SCAs are divided into profiled and non-profiled categories. In a non-profiled assault, an adversary constructs a side-channel leakage model using knowledge of the target system. Once an adversary obtains the model, they can derive the secret key by correlating the side channel from the target and the leakage model. The effectiveness of a non-profiled EM leakage model depends on device architecture, software implementation, and manufacturing technology characteristics. Profiling side-channel attacks, such as template attacks, rely on total leakage to characterize the target device. An adversary can profile the target device and create a leakage template for every conceivable key. The robustness of profiled SCAs to system disturbance and countermeasures is enhanced.  Our recent research has investigated the inter-device portability of DNNs for SCAs across different physical manifestations of the various device architectures that potentially can be applied for EM and RF applications. They demonstrated that manufacturing variations and environmental conditions can significantly impact other devices' efficacy. They enhanced inter-device performance by combining device data before training. Notably, this portability addresses the physical differences between devices with the inter-architecture portability between devices with various processor architecture configurations.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

2 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2021–2025). Reported award amounts total $1,473,431. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase II, Phase I

Agencies: Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.