SBIR/STTR Research Award

Plasma Catalyst Coupling for Improved Conversion of Carbon Dioxide to Methanol

Award identifier 15cd5cd0a0e5c154f489c0b0891550fec5b7601a021df71f9591bb869ecd31e6Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$206,500

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2019

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
HIFUNDA LLC
Proposal award date
2019-07-01
Contract end date
2020-03-31
UEI
CQM5RF47T9E5
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0001941
Topic code
20d

Research abstract

The current cost of implementation of carbon capture and storage (CCS) is well above practical levels, more than tripling the cost of power generation, without carbon credit offsets. Therefore, for US coal plants to be able to implement CCS without significant negative economic impact, there is a critical need for new CCS technologies that can change this economic picture dramatically. One way to take advantage of this economic opportunity is to utilize the effluent CO2 from power plants to produce value-added chemicals, fuels, and polymers that can generate revenue for the plant, thereby changing the CCS implementation from being an undesirable cost, to a value-creating revenue stream for the plant. The HiFunda/PPPL team is proposing to develop and demonstrate a combined low-temperature plasma-UV-catalytic process for converting CO2 to higher-value chemicals, namely methanol. By producing methanol, a value-added fuel, from the CO2 waste stream, the new process will add net economic value to fossil-based power plant operations, and therefore reduce the cost impact of CO2 capture. The HiFunda/PPPL team will develop a combined plasma-UV-catalytic process, carefully designed and optimized using advanced in situ characterization tools available at PPPL. Combined plasma/UV systems have been shown to enhance conversion efficiency and reduce energy usage in a number of other applications. Our proposed Phase 1 technical approach will leverage in situ characterization techniques to better understand the plasma, UV-photocatalyst and plasma-catalyst interactions, and the synergies between the plasma catalytic process and the photocatalytic process for the CO2/H2O reaction to produce methanol directly from combustion exhaust streams.The proposed approach will have a significant positive effect on power generation, carbon capture, and chemical production in the US and worldwide. With over 5 billion metric tons of CO2 emissions in the United States in 2017, utilization and conversion of CO2 can make coal plants implement CCS in an economically viable way. The use of CO2 to produce products may require less energy, less reagents, and generate less waste than production from petroleum or natural gas feedstocks, which can significantly lower life-cycle carbon footprints.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

33 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2010–2025). Reported award amounts total $15,142,888. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Energy, Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Science Foundation, Department of Commerce

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.