SBIR/STTR Research Award

Novel Lightweight, Low-Cost Heliostat for Concentrating Solar Power

Award identifier 91a22ef25b76a5de1824a9c007ce7f9baa8fc84662563a58966286f4cf577438Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$199,921

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2019

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
L'GARDE, INC.
Proposal award date
2019-07-01
Contract end date
2020-06-30
UEI
LEUWTPVHDXA8
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0001941
Topic code
12f

Research abstract

Heliostats in use today are comprised mainly of many mirror facets which are mosaiced onto a structure with a reflective area of typically over 100 m2, and centrally controlled with long, wired connections. They are heavy and require large concrete slabs to support them. More recently, some companies have changed strategy and are investigating smaller area monolithic heliostats, nominally a few square meters with a single facet. These heliostats track and point with local controls, use a mounted small-area photovoltaic array for electrical power, and require just a rigid post for mounting, due to the much-reduced weight. Our proposed mirror facets address this new strategy well; the weight of our 4 m2 mirror facets are estimated to weigh 7 kg/m2 as opposed to existing facets using ~4 mm thick mirrors and metallic substrates and weighing upwards of 12 kg/m2. This competitive advantage allows not only for less support structure, but reduces shipping and labor costs, since our 4 m2 facet will weigh less than 30 kg. In addition, our facet cost per unit area is much less than conventional facets. At large volumes typical of utility-level concentrated solar power (CSP) facilities, the nominal cost of our facets is under $30/m2, in large volumes, possibly as low as $25/m2. The technical objectives of this proposed Phase I research and development effort are: (1) demonstration of L.Garde heliostat mirror fabrication scalability to large area mirrors, (2) development of the mirror support structure, (3) qualification of large area mirrors through field testing, and (4) development of path towards secure integration into nation’s electricity grid and cost models to determine cost of electricity to consumers. Although it is not possible for us to accurately calculate this effect on the LCOE of the system at this time, the weight reduction will impact the costs of shipping, handling, storage, labor and ancillary equipment. A 4 m2, 28 kg facet (~62 lbs) is easily transported and installed by two handlers, will require less structural support and a smaller motor for sun tracking. Therefore, it’s possible that this may translate to a total reduction in levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) of 20% or more.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

67 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1983–2025). Reported award amounts total $21,901,140. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy, Department of Commerce

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.