SBIR/STTR Research Award

STTR Phase I: Resonant Sensors for Wireless Monitoring of Viable Cell Concentration in Small, Disposable Bioreactors

Award identifier 535635a52e7d266a7c05da441c88e396169efbddc33a856c2806e383f1c8810bAwarding agency National Science Foundation

Award amount

$225,000

Program and phase

STTR · Phase I

Award year

2019

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
National Science Foundation
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
Skroot Laboratory Inc.
Proposal award date
2019-07-01
Contract end date
2020-02-29
UEI
UVYRXL78USR1
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
BT

Research abstract

The broader impact/commercial potential of this Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) Phase I project is to develop a resonant sensor system to monitor cell viability in small bioreactors. Cell factories are responsible for producing more than $150B worth of cell therapies, protein therapies, industrial enzymes, and small molecules each year. At the development phase, there are few technologies to monitor viable cell concentration, a critical quality attribute in a large array of bioreactors. Current methods to monitor cell viability are labor intensive, expensive, and can compromise quality. The proposed technology could be embedded into the walls of disposable flasks and bioreactors to provide real-time measurement of viable cell concentration. This could enable substantial "big data" improvements for bioprocess developers, clonal selection, and small batch production. This STTR Phase I project proposes to demonstrate passive, wireless sensing of viable cell concentration with resonant sensors. Dielectric probes are used in industry to correlate culture capacitance to viable cell concentration in large culture volumes. In this proposal, the change in culture capacitance in small culture volumes could be wireless reported with a passive sensor embedded as part of the disposable culture flask or single-use bioreactor. In this form factor, it would never make contact with the cell product, would be wirelessly implemented, and would have potential to be easily multiplexed. Technical objectives for this work are 1) determining the extent of confounding signal effects from movement, media composition and temperature; 2) building a Bluetooth enabled reader pad for implementation in an incubator; and 3) developing an algorithm that translates the complex resonant sensor amplitude and phase data into simple parameters that can be used to track viable cell concentration. In addition, the plan is to model and test the effect of resonator geometry, material composition, and sensor placement. The goal is to produce a robust sensor system for cell viability to test in real culture conditions on numerous cell types. This award reflects NSF's statutory mission and has been deemed worthy of support through evaluation using the Foundation's intellectual merit and broader impacts review criteria.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

2 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2019–2021). Reported award amounts total $1,224,905. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase II, Phase I

Agencies: National Science Foundation

Agency intelligence

National Science Foundation

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.