SBIR/STTR Research Award

Nanostructured Proton Exchange Membrane

Award identifier f3f86f1dd2f2d9bfa9f16d536842930070c5ba8d620884b2aa01683bdea2773dAwarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$206,500

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2019

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
ESPIN TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Proposal award date
2019-07-01
Contract end date
2020-02-29
UEI
NLG9DS1TAJ58
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0001941
Topic code
10a

Research abstract

The polymer electrolyte membrane (PEM) remains one of the most significant cost components of the fuel cell (FC) stack. Development of a low-cost PEM suitable for rapid commercialization of FCs, with a wide range of desired characteristics meeting the DOE performance targets is the subject of this project. This Small Business Innovation Research Phase I project aims to design, develop, and produce a new low-cost proton conducting polymer electrolyte membrane employing nanofiber electrospinning technology. The proton exchange membrane will be produced using low cost non-fluorinated polymers. This ultra-thin membrane will be composed of a robust ionomer having inorganic backbone embedded in a reinforcing network of sub-micron diameter fibers co-electrospun from a thermally and chemically stable polymer. During Phase I, the ionically conducting hydrocarbon polymer will be synthesized and process for membrane production will be fully developed; the resultant membranes will be characterized in terms of microstructural features, mechanical, thermal and chemical stability, proton transport characteristics and fuel cell performance. The prospective Phase II work shall address long-term fuel cell durability and development of manufacturing processes to meet the cost targets.The proposed electrospinning project will lead to a potential commercial product that may not only accelerate deployment of automotive fuel cells but can also have a significant environmental impact. From technical point of view, the subject polymer electrolyte membrane will have the major physicochemical characteristics (specific resistance, mechanical strength and lateral swelling) similar or better than those of the currently available PFSA (perfluorinated!) fuel cell membranes but with the advantage of significantly increased thermal stability, lower hydrogen and oxygen crossover rates and lower production cost. Additionally, the use of the proposed membrane will lead to simplification of the fuel cell hydration subsystem and will eliminate the threat of dangerous releases of fluorine compounds inherent to the operation of fuel cells with PFSA-based PEMs. If funded and successfully completed, the project might help reversing the erosion of manufacturing in the US.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

22 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2001–2024). Reported award amounts total $9,464,476. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Science Foundation, Department of Energy, Environmental Protection Agency

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.