SBIR/STTR Research Award

Low-cost, low-defect, 2" GaN epi-ready substrates processed with E-Grinding

Award identifier db8af84c44ea4058c90f116e58c2883e7386fc91f0caf84b8502f5f431468671Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$1,000,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2018

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
SIXPOINT MATERIALS, INC.
Proposal award date
2018-08-27
Contract end date
2020-08-26
UEI
E9NSMRRKTL49
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0001795
Topic code
11a

Research abstract

Gallium nitride substrates are the key material for achieving high-end, energy-efficient semiconductor devices such as light emitting diodes (LEDs), laser diodes, power transistors and RF transistors. Significant effort has been exerted to develop cost-effective near-equilibrium ammonothermal (NEAT) growth of bulk GaN crystals; however, due to extreme hardness and chemical stability, a low-cost wafering process for bulk GaN crystals has not been fully established yet. During this DOE SBIR Phase I and Phase II project, SixPoint has met milestones to achieve a low-cost wafering process with incorporation of a novel grinding process called E-Grinding. We have achieved atomically smooth 2" GaN substrates with minimum amount of residual subsurface damage. In addition, incorporation of E-Grinding led to a 45% reduction of total processing time. The developed wafering process provided a high-quality GaN surface suitable for successive device fabrication. Through the ARPA-E SWITCHES program, we have demonstrated 1200 V p-n diodes fabricated on NEAT GaN substrates. However, while commercializing the NEAT GaN substrates, we have recognized three remaining problems which are impeding wide customer acceptance. In this Phase IIB project, we will solve 1) crystal lattice and physical bowing of GaN substrates, 2) large variation of miscut angle, and 3) residual nano-scale particle contaminants on the surface. Through reduction of oxygen concentration in NEAT GaN growth, we will reduce lattice mismatch which causes crystal lattice bowing. In addition, we will examine mechanical stress at each step in the wafering process to minimize the physical bow. To control miscut angle accurately, we will improve both the slicing and grinding processes through development of new adjustable stages. A new method for cleaning CMP-ed GaN surfaces will be established through surface analysis of GaN with residual particles. Chemical etching as well as physical removal methods will be employed to achieve particle-free GaN surfaces. The successful development of low-cost, low-defect 2" epi-ready GaN substrates will increase customer acceptance of SixPoint’s GaN substrates and consquently accelerate development of various in-demand GaN-based devices for making society more energy-efficient and IoT-connected.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

10 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2012–2022). Reported award amounts total $6,249,475. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase II, Phase I

Agencies: Department of Energy, Department of Defense, National Science Foundation

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.