SBIR/STTR Research Award

Tortuous vascular accessibility with a novel coaxial active deflectable microcatheter

Award identifier 47b93a2ba5be442a1c86a00fd67c97e616d0ac3895b7a6219e4e42534aebd017Awarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$1,818,904

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2018

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
Agile Devices, Inc.
Proposal award date
2018-08-15
Contract end date
2019-07-31
UEI
M8QRGKF2L4Y9
Solicitation number
PA16-302
Topic code
NHLBI

Research abstract

Project Summary The goal of this project is to introduce a new microcatheter that will significantly improve an interventional radiologist s ability to navigate across small blood vesselsMicrocatheters are designed to reach small vascular targets from access points such as the femoral or radial arterieslocated up tocm awayInterventional radiologists use these devices to treat a wide variety of ailmentsfrom a traumatic vessel rupture to a hepatomaAccess and navigation of small vesselshowevercan be difficult in up toof all caseswhere there is challenging anatomy or when multiple targets are presentDifficulties in navigation can result in added procedure timeunpredictable schedulingincreased radiation exposureandin time critical processes such as a ruptured pseudoaneurysmpoorer clinical outcomesIn cases where navigation is challengingthe interventionalist can switch to microcathetersguidewiresor guide catheters with different shapes or stiffness to help with vessel selectionbut at additional cost and timeWe have developed a microcatheterthe Ausing a novel coaxial design that allows active deflection of the microcatheter tipwhile satisfying the size requirements for general microvascular and neurovascular procedures and preserving the tracking and torqueing properties of existing microcathetersThis would greatly enhance the operator s ability to navigate the vasculatureand reduce the need to stock and use passive devices with different shapesWe have provided proof of concept on a model testbed and also in vivoIn Phaseof this proposal we will focus on refinement our microcatheter prototypes to achieve a design freezeThis requires the development of an anatomically accurate vascular testbed that highlights the challenges encountered by the interventional radiologist and quantitative comparisons to commercially available microcatheters devices that will define the performance milestones of the AmicrocatheterIn Phasewe will focus on in vitro design verification and in vivo design validation testing versus predicate devices for ak applicationWe intend to achievek clearance withinyears and first in human use immediately afterwards

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

3 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2018–2021). Reported award amounts total $3,059,946. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase II, Phase I

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.