SBIR/STTR Research Award

Variable speed operation in hydroelectric

Award identifier 6ff866bbf0cfbae92359c6e0c4a65dcf4d6e19ada6266e1853525c33d7a03b6fAwarding agency Department of Agriculture

Award amount

$99,552

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2017

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Agriculture
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
BURNSHIRE HYDROELECTRIC LLC
Proposal award date
2017-06-15
Contract end date
2018-02-14
UEI
FLMNBHMVL355
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
8.6

Research abstract

Hydropower is now increasingly operated outside of original design conditions due to changing water availability and environmental induced operating parameters. Fifty percent of operational hydroelectric dams in the United States are 50 years or older and nearly all were designed to operate steadily as a primary base load resource. Compounding these issues is the increasing prevalence of intermittent power producers such as wind and solar. Because hydropower has a relatively stable supply of "fuel", it can more easily ramp up or down power production quickly as intermittent producers add to or disappear from the power grid. Increasingly, hydropower generators are forced to cycle on and off to accommodate power grid congestion and this cycling results in excessive wear and tear to hydropower mechanical and electrical components.Standard turbines and generators were designed to operate steadily as baseload suppliers with a narrow range of design operations (water head, flow rate, and turbine speed). Operating outside of these parameters in a traditional generator setup results in poor quality power (voltage and frequency). Therefore, traditional generators must halt power production when design operating conditions do not exist. Modern power electronics will alleviate these problems by providing an electronic, non-mechanical mechanism to match power production to various water head and flow conditions. This project will quantify the range of scalable power achievable across varying flow conditions made possible with power electronics and new generation permanent magnet generators.By modulating head and flow at a typical hydropower site, this project will test and demonstrate that power electronics can internally maintain quality power production even under variable flow and head conditions. This would likely decrease additional wear and tear to hydropower drivetrain equipment while adding the ability to maintain power export when a typical generator would be forced offline. Once demonstrated and refined, the processes collected from this research will be deployable to sixty percent of all hydropower sites in the United States allowing greater distributed power generation. Adding the ability to operate under variable conditions will also allow hydroelectric sites to meet environmental and ecological demands while sharing the power grid other power producers.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

2 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2017–2018). Reported award amounts total $698,787. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase II, Phase I

Agencies: Department of Agriculture

Agency intelligence

Department of Agriculture

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.