SBIR/STTR Research Award

Development and Characterization of SiC-Clad Control Rods & SiC Guide Tubes for Accident-Tolerant

Award identifier 494d13f7984d2a1e5896915f6214e01b9458b7e31bf4972a24a2f69ebfe3369cAwarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$149,914

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2017

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Proposal award date
2017-06-12
Contract end date
2018-03-11
UEI
JSG1V985GLH9
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0001619
Topic code
29g

Research abstract

In a loss of coolant accident, the fuel rod cladding can overheat and burst open exposing the nuclear fuel within. It can also react chemically with the residual steam present in the core to release hydrogen, forming a potentially explosive mixture that can challenge containment integrity. Accident-tolerant fuel attempts to prevent these effects by replacing the zirconium-alloy fuel rod cladding with a non-reactive ceramic material such as silicon-carbide (SiC). Currently, the fuel assembly guide tubes are also made from zirconium alloy, so changing their material to SiC will support the accident-tolerant fuel program. During a reactor accident, keeping the control rods and absorber intact helps prevent a re-criticality. This would be of particular benefit if fresh water with no soluble boron has to be introduced into the vessel to cool the core during the post-accident mitigation phase. The control rod cladding is currently stainless steel that could suffer structural failure during accident conditions. Also, the silver-indium- cadmium (Ag-In-Cd) alloy that is the typical absorber material used in PWR control rods has a low melting point. So in a loss of coolant accident during which the control rods could overheat and fail, the potential exists for the absorber to melt and drain out of the core leading to a potential re-criticality. The purpose of this project is to develop the manufacturing processes required for SiC control rods and guide tubes. Several different replacement absorber materials will also be fabricated and evaluated. 3D CAD models of one or more control rod assembly and guide tube assembly concepts will be created. The concepts will be evaluated considering loads and functionality to determine the best design. Existing processes for fabrication of SiC fuel rod cladding will be modified as needed to fabricate control rods, guide tubes and the associated end plugs or connection parts. The process for three different hafnium compound absorber candidates (HfO2, HfB2 and HfC) will also be developed. Samples of the guide tube, control rod and the absorbers will then be characterized and tested. Based on the Phase I results, the processes will be refined and additional analyses and tests will be performed that include full-scale SCRAM tests and flow tests and irradiation tests.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

24 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2016–2025). Reported award amounts total $12,327,238. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Energy, Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.