SBIR/STTR Research Award

Development of HfC Barrier Coatings for Accident-Tolerant Control Rods

Award identifier d5cb297660be324d0b2f43cc74de2900379c6ed9a99bd5079f87377d6cd4d4a6Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$1,649,494

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2025

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Proposal award date
2025-04-14
Contract end date
2027-04-13
UEI
JSG1V985GLH9
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0003462
Topic code
C57-13c

Research abstract

The typical absorber material used in Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR) control rods is a silver-indium-cadmium alloy with a low melting point. Hence, in a loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA) during which the control rods could overheat and fail, the absorber could melt and drain out of the core leading to a potential re-criticality. Accident-tolerant control rods seek to avoid this problem by substituting a high-melting-point material for the absorber. Hafnium carbide (HfC) is often proposed for this application because hafnium has excellent neutron absorbing properties and hafnium carbide has a melting point of 3900°C. However, HfC is thermodynamically unstable in water at PWR operating conditions. Therefore, should a cladding breach occur during normal operation, high temperature water could enter the control rod and dissolve the HfC, thereby resulting in a loss of shutdown margin. During the Phase I proof-of-concept laboratory work various coatings were developed to protect HfC absorber pellets from high temperature water. Both singlelayer and multi-layer barrier coatings were deposited onto HfC pellets that were fabricated during a previous research program. The coated test articles were extensively characterized and then subjected to thermal cycling tests, mechanical strength tests, and long-term corrosion tests. An ancillary issue that was identified is the short L/D ratio of HfC pellets that makes them difficult to handle and load into control rods. In Phase I we also developed prototype fixturing and processes to assemble multiple pellets into short mini-columns and showed that they can then be handled and installed as a unit. Sample HfC pellets were also produced using commercial sintering with higher density and better dimension control at substantially reduced cost. This is a critical step towards commercialization. In Phase II, this bench-scale fabrication, testing, and characterization work will be scaled up culminating in the fabrication and testing of full-scale partial-length prototype control rods. This testing will include long duration elevated temperature water exposure tests, flow tests, SCRAM tests, and life & wear tests. Coated HfC reactor test specimens will also be fabricated for long-term irradiation in Phase IIA.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

24 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2016–2025). Reported award amounts total $12,327,238. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Energy, Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.