SBIR/STTR Research Award

Multi-Channel Readout IC for Nuclear Physics Experiments

Award identifier 54440193edf5d26f961aaf9572c5c1abe496d5602817d7d07a4ec3ef6daf3197Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$154,663

Program and phase

STTR · Phase I

Award year

2017

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
Alphacore, Inc.
Proposal award date
2017-02-21
Contract end date
2017-11-20
UEI
CXMPDDLFBCH3
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0001618
Topic code
24b

Research abstract

Low-power, low-cost, multi-channel readout integrated circuits (ROICs) are needed in basically all nuclear physics experiments. While new and effective circuit architectures that take advantage of the newest low- power, inherently radiation-hard digital CMOS technologies have been developed and are commonly used in commercial electronics applications, the ROICs used in nuclear physics experiments commonly still suffer from high power consumption, vulnerability to radiation effects and prohibitive price. Moreover, the ROICs used in these experiments are often custom designed just one target application in mind and the whole design cycle is started from beginning for every new experiment, which increases costs and lengthens the development schedules. To overcome the limitations stated above Alphacore will design a ROIC that takes advantage of power efficient design architectures and is applicable to many nuclear physics experiments. The ROIC has the following specifications: (1) 16 - 32 channels; (2) Programmable low noise preamplifier front-ends (shaping time requirements vary from program to program); (3) ADCs will have 12b – 14b resolution, 40 - 100 MSPS sampling rate and <60mW power consumption; (4) Radiation tolerance that meets nuclear physics experiments requirements; (5) Cost 75% lower per channel than the price of existing solutions. In Phase I Alphacore will design and simulate all the sub-circuits needed in the ROIC. Alphacore aims to demonstrate the feasibility of the concept during Phase I, followed by fabrication and testing of a prototype in Phase II. Commercial applications and other benefits. Alphacore has received a strong support letter from Dr. Tonko Ljubicic of BNL. He is seeking hardware solutions for the readout system such as the proposed for the STAR experiment. The ROIC is also an excellent match to many other planned nuclear physics experiments, such as Electron Ion Collider. According to Dr. Ljubicic, these programs each required tens of thousands of channels. Alphacore has also received strong support from companies and institutions that develop imagers for UAV and space based photon counting applications, as well as other defense applications.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

155 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2013–2026). Reported award amounts total $63,784,604. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy, Department of Commerce

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.