SBIR/STTR Research Award

Game-Based Combat Rescue Helicopter Aircrew Mission Training and Rehearsal

Award identifier fb31928a1a115f981cc5de589d3803372bc06a040f0693e91a49e8850dda6240Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$143,107

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2016

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
PROGENY SYSTEMS, LLC
Proposal award date
2016-09-09
Contract end date
2017-05-01
UEI
MU3CM1145E44
Solicitation number
2016.1
Topic code
AF161-039

Research abstract

ABSTRACT: The purpose of the SBIR topic is to develop and demonstrate an aircrew simulator/game that allows training in a high-fidelity environment, complete with configurable and reportable performance metrics and data gathering. The solution will need to include the ability for trainers to design and distribute scenario and training material with turn-key efficiency.Progeny Systems will develop a training exemplar after researching the most qualified game engine appropriate for the source material based on an established rubric. This training exemplar will demonstrate the simulator itself, the scenario designer for use by training instructors, and the database for collection and reporting of desired performance metrics.; BENEFIT: The Phase 1 effort is aimed at researching the appropriate game engine technology to power the simulator, as well as development of a scenario designer to be used in conjunction with the game engine. This will lead into the development of a training exemplar/prototype to be delivered at the end of the Phase 1 effort.The initial effort during Phase 1 will be the evaluation and selection of a capable game engine to power the simulator itself. This evaluation will be performed using a specialized rubric to ensure that the engine meets every possible need of the final simulator.Alongside the research effort for the game engine, a scenario designer will be developed with the end-user in mind. This scenario designer will be powerful and capable, but should require no special training for the end-user, presenting an easy-to-use interface capable of generating scenarios and scenario packages. Questions asked directly to the TPOC and SMEs during Phase 1 will provide the information needed to ensure that the selections within the scenario designer are accurate and reflect real-world usage.A server database will then be defined and configured to accept, store, and report on configurable performance metrics generated by actions completed in the game simulator. This database will be capable of storing metrics and reporting on individual performance records and analysis of emerging trends within users of the simulator. Questions asked directly to the TPOC and SMEs will help define which performance metrics should be initially included for tracking.For Phase 1, physical control schemes for the prototype will be limited to traditional keyboard/mouse and gamepad support, with possible expansion for control capability in Phase II.This Phase I work will result in a fully working exemplar prototype which provides a solution to the initial problem presented by the Air Force. A prototype/Version 1.0 of the Scenario Editor will be provided with the ability to generate separate scenarios. These scenarios will feed into the game engine executable, loading in specific configuration items that will directly influence the scenario that plays out. Completing or failing any scenario will generate reportable metrics, stored in a database for future reporting and incorporation into trend analysis.Phase II work will likely branch out into more complex and configurable scenarios and scenario packages, along with updated control schemes for the game end-user. These control schemes will likely include efforts in the Augmented Reality or Virtual Reality game space, which will allow for even higher fidelity and significant realism within the game world itself.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

301 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1996–2020). Reported award amounts total $149,466,550. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Homeland Security, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Transportation

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.