SBIR/STTR Research Award

Rapid LFIA blood test for SCD using highly specific monoclonal antibodies

Award identifier 77e5c1ddf4c751b62edb16b3395726b936e8f8d05c81a20a5e60b2c4a1fac35cAwarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$1,000,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2016

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
SILVER LAKE RESEARCH CORPORATION
Proposal award date
2016-08-22
Contract end date
2018-07-31
UEI
C9FZMJCTQFP4
Solicitation number
HL14-010
Topic code
NHLBI

Research abstract

PROJECT SUMMARY ABSTRACT This proposal describes Phase II of the development of a rapid immunoassay test kit for the determination of hemoglobin variants in blood to be used as a point of care diagnostic test for sickle cell disease SCD and SCD carrier trait in low resource settings worldwide Today determination of SCD and SCD trait requires lengthy and expensive laboratory analyses that are not available in low resource settings and andgt of individuals with SCD and SCD trait live in areas where healthcare is provided in those settings Nevertheless newborn screening programs have resulted in significant improvement of patient outcomes due to early treatment to prevent complications of the disease The proposed test kit will be a lateral flow immunoassay similar in principle to a home pregnancy test The test design is based on monoclonal antibodies MAbs specific for the single amino acid differences between SCD related hemoglobin variants In Phase I the applicant developed a working prototype hemotyping test kit which was shown to correctly identify the phenotype of andgt of tested whole blood samples including each relevant SCD and carrier phenotype The prototype test requires a microliter volume of blood and the time to result is under minutes In Phase II the test kit will be further improved and simplified and a complete manufacturable product will be developed Clinical validation studies will be carried out to determine the real world performance of the product including studies performed in low resource settings in Brazil At the successful conclusion of Phase II the test kit will be ready for manufacturing and submission for approval to regulatory agencies worldwide The estimated cost of the hemotyping test kit will be $ a price point that will allow widespread acceptance of this test kit in developing countries PROJECT NARRATIVE Sickle cell disease is prevalent in developing countries where current instrument intensive diagnostic testing is not available due to cost and technology barriers This proposal continues the development an accurate simple inexpensive and rapid test for determination of SCD and SCD carrier status in low resource settings

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

12 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2006–2023). Reported award amounts total $9,165,947. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services, Environmental Protection Agency

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.