SBIR/STTR Research Award

Stable, lowloss joints for HTS fusion magnets

Award identifier 510e1228293870fa021b633ae0dae03d1e56390477f8653b014abc7c510513d1Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$999,999

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2016

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
ADVANCED CONDUCTOR TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Proposal award date
2016-08-01
Contract end date
2018-07-31
UEI
CLNQLMBDRLH3
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0001490
Topic code
22c

Research abstract

The feasibility of fusion as a practical energy source needs to be improved significantly by removing some of the restrictions that low temperature superconductors put on the fusion magnet systems. One method to simplify the magnet system is by using high temperature superconductors (HTS) that allow for a higher magnet performance and much larger temperature margins. Successful application of HTS in fusion magnets requires reliable, low resistance cable joints. There is currently no practical method of making reliable joints in high current HTS cables. This proposal seeks to develop reliable, low resistance joints between HTS magnet cables that would allow for practical fusion magnets to become a reality. Joints between magnet cables capable of carrying currents exceeding 60 kA will be developed into an industrial product with the goal of having a joint resistance of less than 10 nΩ at 4.220 K. During Phase I of the program, we demonstrated feasibility of our approach to make joints between HTS magnet cables and demonstrated a joint with resistance of 110 nΩ at 77 K in a subscale cable carrying 8 kA. We demonstrated that current was injected homogenously into the cable containing 111 superconducting tapes. During Phase II of the program, the joints will be further optimized to reduce the resistance to below 10 nΩ, while joints between cables containing as many as 400 superconducting tapes will be developed. Several full scale cables with joints will be constructed and their performance will be measured at 4.2 K while carrying currents in excess of 50 kA. Reliable, low resistance joints between high current HTS cables will enable compact fusion magnets, high field magnets for scientific experiments and the next generation of accelerator magnets for particle physics and proton cancer treatment facilities. They will also enable high density power transmission cables for Department of Defense applications. Key words Compact fusion magnets, high temperature superconducting cable joints, demountable fusion magnets. The development of practical and reliable joints between high temperature superconducting cables is necessary for the US to maintain their leadership position in fusion research, materials science, and high energy physics research.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

37 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2012–2025). Reported award amounts total $17,026,014. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Energy, Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.