SBIR/STTR Research Award

Development of long-length CORC® cables and cable-in-conduit-conductors for compact fusion reactors

Award identifier c6e31c39e9a2d1f398d749af965b1f1c6e3e03e1df2695ee5d1f2e02f1ca97c0Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$200,000

Program and phase

STTR · Phase I

Award year

2023

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
ADVANCED CONDUCTOR TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Proposal award date
2023-07-10
Contract end date
2024-04-09
UEI
CLNQLMBDRLH3
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
C56-30a

Research abstract

The next-generation low-inductance magnets generating magnetic fields exceeding 14-20 T at 20 K for fusion applications require flexible, high-current high temperature superconducting (HTS) cables that can be manufactured in long lengths. Such cables are currently not available. Advanced Conductor Technologies proposes to develop high-current (20-80 kA) Conductor on Round Core (CORC®) cables wound from HTS tapes that can be produced in long lengths for fusion magnet applications. During the Phase I program, CORC® cables and highly transposed cable-in- conduit-conductors (CICC) will be developed that allow straightforward manufacturing at long lengths with the mechanical resilience needed for compact fusion reactors. The technology will be developed to wind long CORC® cables from HTS tapes that contain tape-to-tape joints and use current sharing between tapes to enable cable lengths that are independent of HTS tape single piece lengths. Several CORC® cables containing tape-to-tape joints will be manufactured and their critical current performance will be evaluated as a function of bending and axial tensile load, and their thermal stability will be measured at 20 – 40 K using helium gas cooling. Several methods to manufacture transposed CORC®-CICC at long lengths will be developed, in which the CORC® conductor is provided with sufficient mechanical support against the high Lorenz forces during operation. During Phase II, longer CORC® cables will be manufactured, wound into small coils, and their performance tested. Longer CORC®-CICC will be manufactured using at least one of the approaches developed during the Phase I program, and their performance tested in relevant background magnetic fields. If successful, the program will result in long-length CORC® cables, and highly transposed CORC®-CICC needed to make compact fusion reactors a reality. Long-length CORC® cables and CICC will enable next generation of compact fusion magnets for energy generation, high-energy physics magnets, gantry systems for proton cancer treatment facilities, and scientific magnets. These conductors will also benefit power transmission and magnetic energy storage systems for use in the power grid and within the Department of Defense.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

37 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2012–2025). Reported award amounts total $17,026,014. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Energy, Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.