SBIR/STTR Research Award

Development of an Innovative, High-Efficiency Radon Fan

Award identifier bbd2e4bc0cdd6fadfbb694268e913302397bd8ddbf205a27fc693896135051b0Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$150,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2016

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
MECHANICAL SOLUTIONS LLC
Proposal award date
2016-06-13
Contract end date
2017-03-12
UEI
Y3XLZBWYMU96
Solicitation number
DE-FOA-0001417
Topic code
11

Research abstract

The problem is twofold: 1) The EPA estimates that radon causes more than 20,000 deaths per year in the US, and is the second leading cause of lung cancer after smoking1. Furthermore, as new “tight” construction increases radon risk unless mitigation technologies are employed. Mitigation technologies have been proved effective. The EPA estimates approximately 6 million homes suffer from elevated radon levels2 but only 600,000 have mitigation systems installed3. 2) In addition to public education on the risks associated with radon, a reduction in the operating cost will be likely to aid in public acceptance of mitigation systems. Current radon fan systems operate continuously using decades-old and very inefficient flow path technology. Radon fans use approximately 390 million kW-hours of energy annually. How this problem is being addressed: Current efficiencies are typically below 20% with energy consumption of 70 to 85 watts. The MSI team will target a 60% efficiency based on pre-proposal design and analysis work. A 3x increase in efficiency will radically transform the market. Not only will there be direct energy savings but the market as a whole will need to respond to the much higher efficiency. MSI project collaborator, Fantech, is a market leader providing design requirement details and a commercialization path. What is to be done in Phase I: MSI will use an advanced but well-practiced design and development process to produce a detailed fan design during Phase I. Fantech will confirm requirements and constraints associated with cost, manufacturability, footprint/packaging, reliability, and noise. A detailed fan design will be the key outcome of the Phase I SBIR effort. Commercial Application and Other Benefits: Reducing radon fan electric usage and operating costs by about two-thirds under this project should raise the bar across the radon fan industry. The main benefit is reducing lung cancer deaths. Lowering operating/electric usage costs for homeowners should increase radon fan usage in more of the 6 million homes in the USA that suffer from excessive radon levels. The other benefit is significantly reducing the energy currently used by inefficient radon fans. Key Words: Radon fans, high efficiency, computational fluid dynamics (CFD), swept blades, lung cancer prevention

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Research funding history

84 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1998–2025). Reported award amounts total $42,330,247. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Energy, National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.