SBIR/STTR Research Award

Low Cost Olefin Production from Shale Gas by Laser Enhanced Pyrolysis through Spatial Beam Decoherence

Award identifier e2a1a2ee939d73a6c1b7cb799fd29363b4bf82e2cceca6f3017bde81271034caAwarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$149,969

Program and phase

STTR · Phase I

Award year

2016

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
Solid Cell Inc.
Proposal award date
2016-02-23
Contract end date
2016-11-21
UEI
LS3FZEYNY6K7
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
14a

Research abstract

The new shale oil and gas boom in the United States has propelled the US to the largest oil and gas producer in the world. A consequence of this prosperity is an oversupply of shale gas on the market. With steady growth in the ethylene market at 4 - 5% per year, new ethylene production capacity near the source of shale gas would create a valuable market for excess shale gas and reduce the flaring of shale gas in the oil fields. However, conventional thermal crackers for ethylene plants have capital costs in the billions of dollars, imposing a very high barrier to entry for new plant capacity. Solid Cell will develop an innovative low cost shale gas olefin production process that can be economically sited at the point of shale gas production. Recent work in laser-enhanced catalytic pyrolysis of ethane has demonstrated much higher selectivity for ethylene at a significantly lower reactor wall temperature. The lower wall temperature of the reactor reduces material constraints and unwanted by-product formation. The higher selectivity simplifies downstream separation processes, resulting in substantial cost savings. In the The overall objective of the Phase I program is to produce an economical and scalable olefin production process. This will be accomplished by performing a feasibility study to quantify the capital and operating costs of a distributive olefin production plant near shale gas and oil fields; and a proof-of-concept experiment to convert the alkane components in shale gas to ethylene and/or propylene at significantly lower reactor wall temperatures, higher selectivities, and with less by-product formation using laser enhanced catalytic pyrolysis in place of conventional pyrolysis technology. The commercial application will be the economical conversion of shale gas resources, that are otherwise flared to atmosphere, to olefins, which are the largest consumed building blocks for chemicals and petrochemicals in the world. One-third of the shale gas is flared due to oversupply and lack of plant capacity to process the shale gas. This project will investigate a new process for converting shale gas to olefins, which are the most consumed building blocks for chemicals and petrochemicals in the world today.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

3 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2016–2020). Reported award amounts total $514,918. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Science Foundation, Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.