SBIR/STTR Research Award

High Charge Density Hydrocarbon-Based PEMs

Award identifier 5153762be410ea1560aeab879447d386e86d8ee021b9d85cbbf4fa15405ddd74Awarding agency Department of Energy

Award amount

$149,990

Program and phase

STTR · Phase I

Award year

2016

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Energy
Branch
Not reported
Recipient company
GINER INC
Proposal award date
2016-02-12
Contract end date
2016-11-21
UEI
ULB2NMDNXC69
Solicitation number
Not reported
Topic code
12c

Research abstract

Despite incremental improvements in the technology, polyfluorosulfonic acid (PFSA) membranes are still not an ideal fuel cell membrane material and their drawbacks (e.g., high cost and low mechanical strength at high temperature) require development of alternative polymer electrolyte membranes (PEMs) for successful adoption of fuel cells as reliable and inexpensive energy conversion devices. The goal of this proposed project is the development of novel hydrocarbon-based ionomeric membranes with high conductivity and mechanical strength for use in low RH, high temperature fuel cell applications. Giner’s proven Dimensionally Stable Membrane (DSM) technology will be used to further increase the strength of the membranes and increase resistance to creep at high temperatures. The end product of this project will be a less expensive viable alternative to PFSA for use in automotive fuel cells and other applications. In this project, Chulsung Bae of Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute will work with Giner to expand upon his work in hydrocarbon-based ionomers for fuel cells. He will develop and provide novel membranes to Giner for incorporation into the DSM support structure. Giner will then fully characterize these membranes with respect to conductivity, water uptake, gas permeability and mechanical strength to find an optimum group of membranes to move up the Phase II program for MEA performance and lifetime testing. Current fuel cell technology relies on proton-exchange membranes that are expensive to manufacture and are prone to degradation during operation. Giner, Inc., in partnership with Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, will develop membranes that are much less expensive and that exhibit very good durability for use in fuel cells for vehicles. Commercial Applications and Other Benefits: Giner’s immediate market for these membranes will be for military application, where there are numerous systems that need specialty fuel cell MEAs for unmanned underwater vehicles, unmanned aerial vehicles and energy storage applications for remote bases using renewable energy sources. The major future market is the automotive industry.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

447 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1983–2025). Reported award amounts total $147,003,828. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Energy, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Science Foundation, Department of Agriculture

Agency intelligence

Department of Energy

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.