SBIR/STTR Research Award

Constructive Logic and Behavior Engine for Efficient and Responsive Training (COLBERT)

Award identifier 21c25de4826ff604f1717911e875b9d42f3ad02244f5007d0ad8a52adc99109aAwarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$749,984

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2015

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
CHARLES RIVER ANALYTICS, INC.
Proposal award date
2015-08-20
Contract end date
2017-12-01
UEI
DD1BYN8SN355
Solicitation number
2014.1
Topic code
AF141-020

Research abstract

ABSTRACT:Simulations supporting Close Air Support (CAS) training and the Joint Terminal Attack Controller (JTAC) training are laborious to configure and expensive to manage with live personnel, which results in training that is limited in scope. For example, current simulations, like the Indirect Fire Forward Observer Trainer (I-FACT), require numerous observer/controllers to participate as White Force players in the simulation, driving up the manpower cost of conducting JTAC training. To fulfill the roles, communications, and behaviors of White Force participants in simulation-based training environments, we conducted a Phase I effort to design and demonstrate a full-scope Constructive Logic and Behavior Engine for Efficient and Responsive Training (COLBERT). In Phase I, we successfully established the feasibility of our approach by providing a graphical development and run-time environment to construct and execute CAS-related behavior models. COLBERT integrated our in-house, intelligent agent platform AgentWorks with the popular video game engine Unity, and included experience management tools that support Trainers across the multiple phases of training development. Based on the successful completion of Phase I, we propose a Phase II effort to design, develop, and evaluate COLBERT. In Phase II, we will deliver an initial set of simulation-based tools to support JTAC training.BENEFIT:COLBERT will provide immediate and tangible benefits to training developers by supporting effective and cost-efficient training across a wide range of domains and simulation environments, including the Joint Terminal Attack Controller Training Rehearsal System being developed at AFRL. COLBERT will also provide considerable benefit for other simulation-based training, including flight and space maintenance simulation training. In addition, we plan to enhance our user-friendly agent development environment, AgentWorks, with training capabilities that will increase its appeal in both the simulation-based training and entertainment (e.g., video games) markets.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

961 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1984–2026). Reported award amounts total $386,500,110. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Homeland Security, Department of Transportation, Department of Energy

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.