SBIR/STTR Research Award

Optimized Additive Manufacturing for High Dielectric Strength

Award identifier b1f9e21839f75520b6358e0ab133a3855e4c38bc247b9e228e7fb41d68118ddcAwarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$149,933

Program and phase

STTR · Phase I

Award year

2015

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
TETHERS UNLIMITED, INC.
Proposal award date
2015-07-08
Contract end date
2016-03-08
UEI
FHC2EKAPYU47
Solicitation number
2015.1
Topic code
AF15-AT07

Research abstract

ABSTRACT: To produce high dielectric strength insulator materials, our approach, called Optimized Additive Manufacturing for High Dielectric Strength (OAHDS), will optimize fused filament fabrication (FFF) 3D printing in order to fabricate high density parts. Currently, thermoplastics 3D printed via FFF have dielectric strengths one to three orders of magnitude lower than injection molded parts made of the same thermoplastic material due to the high void content present in 3D printed parts. However, unlike some of the other additive manufacturing technologies, FFF is low cost and can easily be adapted to a wide variety of thermoplastics and composite materials in complex geometries, making it an ideal technology to utilize in the proposed effort. We will work to advance FFF to reduce voids via the fabrication of high quality, customized filaments, by determining the 3D printing process controls required to form 100% dense parts, and through the development of custom parts for the 3D printer. An optimized FFF printing technology will enable rapid prototyping, low cost parts, and short lead times to fabrication.; BENEFIT: Our primary objective in the proposed SBIR effort is to utilize fused filament fabrication (FFF) 3D printing to develop high dielectric strength insulators for HPM and other vacuum-based technologies which meet the needs of the DoD as well as any other user of HPMs. Using FFF as a means to develop these insulators will allow for rapid prototyping of new geometries for a variety of insulator applications and will keep costs low for the end-user. We anticipate a very expansive user base for the proposed OAHDS technology. First, the final insulator product will be able to be designed to be used in different high power microwave sources, vacuum technologies, and in other insulator technologies. Second, the high density printing technology which will be developed to facilitate product fabricate will see users across a large number of fields where high mechanical strength in their 3D printed parts is key to their success. Finally, the advancements to the 3D printing technology will see customers in the 3D printing field, including commercial 3D printer developers as well as the home user.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

86 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1992–2019). Reported award amounts total $32,140,882. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II, Phase II – Direct to Phase II

Agencies: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.