SBIR/STTR Research Award

GNSS Universal Anti-spoofing Receiver Design (GUARD) Compatible with Military Global Positioning System (GPS) User Equipment (MGUE)

Award identifier 8a352b8c0351581aaf667085abba3ca7babb22dd9c7c9ea92993f741d39fd0afAwarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$147,361

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2015

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
QUNAV LLC
Proposal award date
2015-06-23
Contract end date
2016-03-24
UEI
C4ZNLZXJWNJ8
Solicitation number
2015.1
Topic code
AF151-147

Research abstract

ABSTRACT:QuNav proposes to develop a GNSS Universal Anti-spoofing Receiver Design (GUARD) technology. GUARD will be implemented as an agile software-defined radio that separates the correlation engine from the signal processor. This allows for the implementation of GNSS signal correlation as a (reconfigurable) hardware while the rest of baseband signal processing is implemented in software. As a result, multi-GNSS signal processing will be implemented as an add-on to MGUE capabilities (i.e., by incorporating additional separate software-defined correlation engines and processing software modules) and without modifying correlation processing of secure military signals. A four-level protection scheme will be applied to multi-GNSS signals for spoofing identification and exclusion. This scheme operates at (i) pre-correlation level with baseband GNSS signal samples; (ii) post-correlation (i.e., IQ) level; (iii) measurement level, and (iv) solution level. Open-service GNSS signals will be fused into the overall PNT estimation only if they pass through this four-level protection scheme. To improve resiliency of MGUE, MGUE will be fused with validated multi-GNSS data both at signal-processing fusing (via mutual aiding for extended signal accumulation), and measurement level. Phase I will full develop the GUARD receiver mechanization, will validate it with simulated and experimental data, and will initially design a prototyping approach.BENEFIT:The GUARD technology has great potential for both military and private sector applications. Many military missions require a higher level assurance for PNT solutions accuracy, availability, integrity, and continuity in face of jamming and spoofing. In addition to DoD applications, protection of multi-GNSS signals against spoofing and their combined use in signal-degraded environments are also directly applicable to civil applications where intentional and unintentional interference becomes a growing concern. We will pursue commercialization for both DoD and civil applications. The main approach is to use Phase I and Phase II efforts to demonstrate the technology and then transition it to military systems and commercial products via licensing and acquisition.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

38 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2011–2024). Reported award amounts total $16,797,199. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.