SBIR/STTR Research Award

Noninvasive brain stimulation for pain suppression

Award identifier a1d6de54f3743d61d90092dc09313a8840241e0de76f1ebac55489974a9aad2eAwarding agency Department of Health and Human Services · National Institutes of Health

Award amount

$1,723,799

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase I

Award year

2015

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Health and Human Services
Branch
National Institutes of Health
Recipient company
HIGHLAND INSTRUMENTS INC
Proposal award date
2015-04-01
Contract end date
2019-06-30
UEI
YVB2H8MCWWX7
Solicitation number
PA14-071
Topic code
213

Research abstract

DESCRIPTION provided by applicant This proposal includes trade secrets and other proprietary or confidential information of Highland Instruments and is being provided for use by the National Institutes of Health NIH for the sole purpose of evaluating this SBIR proposal No other rights are conferred This proposal and the trade secrets and other proprietary or confidential information contained herein shall further not be disclosed in whole or in parts outside of NIH without Highland Instrumentandapos s permission This restriction does not limit the NIHandapos s right to use information contained in the data if it is obtained from another source without restriction This legend applies to the entire proposal including but not limited to the Abstract Introduction Specific Aims Research Plan all components Commercialization Plan and Human Subjectandapos s Sections of this proposal Abstract OA of the knee is a leading cause of chronic pain and disability Conventional treatments do not directly address the fact that pain sensation is processed in the brain and mechanical joint dysfunction can be worsened by chronic pain induced changes in the brainandapos s motor control centers Non Invasive Brain Stimulation NIBS has been successfully applied for the treatment of chronic pain in some disease states where treatment induced changes in brain activity revert maladaptive plasticity associated with the perception sensation of chronic pain However the most common NIBS methods Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation TMS and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation tDCS fail to show consistent clinical benefit on par with that of the conventional pain treatments and are not commonly used for OA therapy It has been postulated that limitations in these techniquesandapos focality penetration and targeting control limit their therapeutc efficacy Electrosonic Stimulation ESStim tm is an improved NIBS modality that overcomes the limitations of other technologies by combining independently controlled electromagnetic and ultrasonic fields to focus and boost stimulation currents via tuned electromechanical coupling in neural tissue This proposal is focused on evaluating whether our noninvasive ESStim system can effectively treat chronic OA pain and in turn improve knee biomechanical function and patient quality of life QOL First in Phase I to assess the feasibilit of the proposed work we will follow OA patients after giving a constant fixed dose of ESStim for min day on consecutive days SHAM ESStim ESStim We will assess a battery of safety pain biomechanical knee function and QOL measures in the patients evaluated over the treatment period and for at least six weeks following the last treatment session Next in Phase II we will follow OA patients after giving a constant fixed dose of stimulation for days min day over a two week period Patients will randomly be assigned to of stimulation conditions ESStim tDCS transcranial ultrasound TUS or SHAM ESStim We will evaluate these patients with the battery of pain biomechanical QOL and safety measures which were validated in the Phase I studies and compare the efficacy of the tested interventions for at least eight weeks following the last treatment session Furthermore we will test whether the ESStim pain suppression can be guided by the baseline disease state To test this we will build and evaluate multivariate linear and generalized linear regression models to predict the clinical outcomes and identify best responders Overall we hypothesize that the proposed experiments computational studies and technology development will allow us to test the effectiveness of ESStim in OA patients The work will serve as the basis for a future large scale multicenter study and further the commercialization of ESStim OA therapy PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE Osteoarthritis OA of the knee is a major cause of chronic pain and a leading cause of disability Alternative therapies such as Non Invasive Brain Stimulation NIBS have been successfully applied for the treatment of chronic pain in other diseases whereby treatment induced changes in brain activity revert maladaptive plasticity associated with the perception sensation of chronic pain This study analyzes NIBS treatments for chronic pain in OA patients

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

19 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (2008–2025). Reported award amounts total $17,502,850. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Health and Human Services

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.