SBIR/STTR Research Award

Innovative, Rapid Non-Linear Physics-Based Aeroelastic Analysis System

Award identifier 90b107055f5d94ab9c6be284caaafa4721b63799bfeb16f25567e8454ce7b201Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$149,892

Program and phase

STTR · Phase I

Award year

2015

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
CONTINUUM DYNAMICS INC
Proposal award date
2015-02-01
Contract end date
2015-11-01
UEI
DUE3E75K1MJ3
Solicitation number
2014.1
Topic code
AF14-AT04

Research abstract

ABSTRACT: Accurate aeroelastic predictions are critical to the development of aircraft and assessment of aircraft/store compatibility since structural deformation and aeroelastic instabilities during flight affect pilot/aircraft safety and mission success. Indeed, several fighter aircraft have demonstrated recurring susceptibility to Limit Cycle Oscillations (LCO) when certain external stores are installed on the aircraft. Despite this critically important issue, the ability to rapidly and accurately predict flutter and LCO with current numerical methods is limited due to modeling fidelity and computational cost. The proposed effort seeks to address these limitations by developing an innovative rapid non-linear physics based flutter/LCO analysis system for implementation on workstation-class hardware. This effort will build upon the extensive experience of Continuum Dynamics, Inc. and Duke University in developing coupled aeromechanics analysis of a wide variety of configurations to bridge the gap between the reduced fidelity models most often used by industry and the resource intensive CFD-based approaches employed in the research environment. The proposed analysis system will be based around a unique variable fidelity non-linear CFD method combined with an innovative analysis procedure and integrated structural dynamics analysis to dramatically reduce the time required to investigate to aeroelastic performance of a new airframe or and store configurations. BENEFIT: A successful SBIR effort would produce an accurate and efficient aeroelastic analysis system for rapidly evaluating airframe and aircraft/store combination stability. This analysis system would directly support the USAFs long-term flutter and LCO prediction goals, particularly with regards to the evaluation of new aircraft/store combinations, aircraft/store modernization efforts and supporting flight test activities. Significant commercialization opportunities are anticipated from licensing the new analysis to major air-vehicle manufacturers and other branches of the government involved in air platform performance enhancement and external stores compatibility.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

271 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1983–2026). Reported award amounts total $78,620,383. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Energy, National Science Foundation, Department of Health and Human Services, Department of Agriculture

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.