SBIR/STTR Research Award

Development of an Efficient Flutter and Limit Cycle Oscillation Predictive Tool

Award identifier ea64cf5ff2075a512a0d8be9ef9068457c367c17f7c771fa5d4b21e6e732820fAwarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$149,906

Program and phase

STTR · Phase I

Award year

2015

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
ZONA TECHNOLOGY INC
Proposal award date
2014-10-31
Contract end date
2015-07-31
UEI
LYMKH9UK64J7
Solicitation number
2014.1
Topic code
AF14-AT04

Research abstract

ABSTRACT: Several current fighter aircraft with external store configurations persistently encounter Limit Cycle Oscillation (LCO) problems. A fast and accurate aeroelastic prediction is required to identify the critical LCO configurations given the massive number of aircraft with store combinations short-time frame demanded by rapid military responses when facing todays ever-changing international situation. To meet this requirement, a LCO predictive tool based on the ZONA Euler Unsteady Solver (ZEUS) will be developed in Phase I. It will include a Message Passing Interface (MPI) implementation to drastically reduce the computational time of ZEUS. Since many studies have shown that the nonlinear aerodynamics alone is not sufficient to yield LCO, rather LCO is due to both nonlinear aerodynamics and Nonlinear Structural Damping (NSD), a generalized van der Pol NSD model will be incorporated into ZEUS to provide a LCO bounding mechanism in the post flutter flight conditions. The LCO predictive capability of ZEUS with MPI will be demonstrated through benchmark comparisons with flight test data. Prior to the end of Phase I, a prototypical ZEUS with MPI version will be installed in the users computational environment to ensure the compatibility between the ZEUS MPI and the users computational architecture. BENEFIT: LCO is a self-excited, sustained vibration of limited amplitude which can impact a pilots control authority over an aircraft, ride quality, and weapon aiming capability. It can also induce structural fatigue and, under certain circumstances, flutter. The LCO clearance of a modern fighter aircraft should be addressed for all possible store/weapon configurations. Given the drastic number of such configurations, this effort is a major engineering task in aircraft/store weapon compatibility certification. The outcome of Phase I will be a LCO predictive tool that can meet the requirement of computational efficiency to generate time-history response solutions for numerous flight conditions per day on conventional multi-processor computer platforms so that potentially dangerous configurations can be identified with confidence reducing the need for flight testing.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

96 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1997–2021). Reported award amounts total $29,806,305. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Science Foundation

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.