SBIR/STTR Research Award

Common Operational Specific Emitter Identification (SEI) functionality for sustained Electronic Warfare (EW) systems

Award identifier 6ac6bed21b13234225bcfd9521e2022787b23b29b7e53940042af3533605db75Awarding agency Department of Defense · Air Force

Award amount

$750,000

Program and phase

SBIR · Phase II

Award year

2015

Explore This Research Award in CaptureIQ

Research the technology, evaluate the recipient and agency, identify related opportunities, and explore potential follow-on work with CaptureIQ.

Award details

Awarding agency
Department of Defense
Branch
Air Force
Recipient company
Research Associates of Syracuse Inc.
Proposal award date
2014-10-24
Contract end date
2016-06-02
UEI
KKBNPCA53LB6
Solicitation number
2012.1
Topic code
AF121-227

Research abstract

ABSTRACT: This SBIR develops, enhances, and integrates multiple Specific Emitter Feature (SEF) techniques and provides an"Operational Specific Emitter Identification (SEI)"[aka Specific Emitter Tracking (SET)] function for sustained Electronic Warfare (EW) systems. Multi-technique extraction and fusion algorithms are leveraged from the AFRL Multi-Technique SEI Test-bed (FPGAs and C/C++) and now in transition to Navy EW programs. New and existing concepts were investigated in Phase-I and performance assessed for resolving same-type emitter ambiguities operating at the same RF and Mode. Modern agile-agile, narrow, long pulse, and intentionally modulated signals are addressed. Automatic feature extraction and match algorithm selection, tracking and updates minimize operator interaction and provide high confidence reports. A Phase-II demonstration concept for testing and characterizing the performance was developed after reviewing and assessing the feasibility of implementing SEI/SET technology into legacy EW systems. An approach was formulated with emphasis on a particular EW system of interest. In Phase-II the COMOPSEI prototype is developed, integrated with a candidate EW system, and demonstrated in laboratory environments using real-world emitter data to show increased identification performance. After Phase-II, RAS will work with EW system primes and the government to transition and demonstrate the technology in the operational EW system of interest. BENEFIT: The key benefit provided to the government by this SBIR is improved situational awareness and thus enhanced survivability by addressing several pulse-processing deficiencies identified in current operational Electronic Warfare (EW) systems. Examples include real-time ambiguity resolution between same-type emitters at the same RF, PW and PRI; enhanced threat warning and self-protection against radar-guided airborne and ground-based threats; reduction in lost and fragmented tracks; proper correlation of RF agile emitters; and proper assessment of raid count thereby providing more efficient allocation of resources to counter the threat. Improved Emitter ID is obtained with the proposed approach as automatic intentional modulation on pulse (IMOP) measurements, shown on other programs to reduce emitter ID ambiguity, is provided. Other benefits include tracking platforms suspected of carrying contraband or WMD, enhanced spectrum knowledge and management, identifying particular platforms (air and surface) from day-to-day and enhancing real-time EOB update accuracy, and in supporting kill removal and damage assessment, Initial military commercialization applications are sustained operational EW airborne platforms; for example the F-15C, B-1 or B-2 (and perhaps the AF B-2 Defense Management System Upgrade). Other possibilities include the NAVY F-18E/F digital receiver upgrade ALR-67(v3) and NAVY surface and sub-surface applications. RAS is currently working with NAVSEA NUWC on the Unique Emitter ID Phase II SBIR and RIF program for AN/BLQ-10B EW Modernization; many functions, FPGA cores and C-code modules will be able to be directly leveraged. Another possible application is the NAVSEA NSWC Surface EW Improvement Program (SEWIP) Block II. Out technology is readily inserted into the COTS NDI, FPGA based digital receiver. Algorithms from this SBIR would have direct application in future upgrades. RAS will explore, with the COTR, applications to these programs as well as others recommended by the government to transition Phase II technology into a Phase III. The concepts to be demonstrated have numerous military and commercial applications. They can be employed in a wide variety of tactical and strategic operational missions encompassing Electronic Attack (EA), Electronic Support (ES), Radar Warning Receivers (RWR), and Electronic Intelligence (ELINT) systems where multiple same-type signals must be rapidly intercepted, characterized and countered. Potential applications in the private sector include passive tracking of RF devices such as cell phones and wireless waveform characterization, RF identification verification, and spectrum assessment and (re)allocation. These will be explored in more detail during the Phase II program under RAS business development funding.

Technology keywords

Not reported

Other awards by this recipient

Verified by the same UEI. These are other public SBIR/STTR award pages, not a merged company record.

Awards with the same topic code

Verified by an exact topic code match. This is not a text-similarity match.

Research funding history

41 SBIR/STTR records share this UEI (1993–2025). Reported award amounts total $14,842,383. Reported amounts are not federal obligations.

Phases: Phase I, Phase II

Agencies: Department of Defense

Agency intelligence

Department of Defense

Back to SBIR/STTR Research Awards

Don't take our word for it. Ask AI about RFPCapture.

See what leading AI assistants have to say about RFPCapture and CaptureIQ.

Gemini opens without a prefilled question. The question is copied to your clipboard when the button works. You can also copy it here:

What is RFPCapture.com and its CaptureIQ platform from Smart Logic AI? How does it help federal contractors discover opportunities, evaluate bid/no-bid decisions, research government contracts, and prepare proposals? How does it compare with other federal capture platforms? Use independent sources where available.